Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 29 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

As states work to maximize limited resources while improving population outcomes, the strategic alignment of planning processes represents a significant opportunity. Key Findings In 2025, the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO) partnered with the Alzheimer’s Association to build on a previous analysis of one state’s SHIP and SPoA and expand the methods to include ADRD plans.2 A systematic crosswalk analysis of SHIPs, SPoAs, and ADRD plans from 5 states (Idaho, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee) revealed significant thematic overlap and opportunities for integration across multiple domains. Practical Tool Overview To translate these findings into practice, ASTHO developed a State Health Planning Crosswalk Tool (publication expected in summer 2025). Conclusion and Next Steps Aligning state health improvement, aging, and dementia plans represents a significant opportunity to move beyond traditional silos and create more effective, efficient, and equitable systems.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Fox, E. W., Leavitt, T. S., Bethune, T. J., & Fadel, M. (2025). Bridging Silos: Aligning State Health Improvement, Aging, and Dementia Plans. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000002182

Vancouver

Fox EW, Leavitt TS, Bethune TJ, Fadel M. Bridging Silos: Aligning State Health Improvement, Aging, and Dementia Plans. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2025. doi:10.1097/phh.0000000000002182. PMID: 40689804.

BibTeX

@article{fox2025-40689804,
  author  = {Fox, Elizabeth Woods and Leavitt, Talyah Sands and Bethune, Tyrone J. and Fadel, Meghan},
  title   = {{Bridging Silos: Aligning State Health Improvement, Aging, and Dementia Plans}},
  journal = {Journal of Public Health Management and Practice},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1097/phh.0000000000002182},
  pmid    = {40689804},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1097/phh.0000000000002182}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This work is about aligning state health improvement, aging, and dementia plans across five states to reduce duplication and improve planning. It does not study any treatment, cure, or prevention of Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 29/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 0 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 29 of 100.29 of 100 points earned71 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Public Health Management and Practice)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Journal of Public Health Management and Practice: journal h-index 79 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 0 / 4 Last-listed author Meghan Fadel: h-index 1 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Alzheimer's Association: institution h-index 250 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40689804)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 29 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also tagged “controlled”

1,118 studies in the library carry the topic tag “controlled”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,118 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →