Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 45 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Plain-language summary

In several retrospective post-mortem studies, patients meeting clinical criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) who gained the greatest cognitive benefit from treatment with an acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor were found to have neocortical Lewy bodies accompanying classical AD neuropathology. This 'dementia with Lewy bodies' (DLB) subtype manifests both parkinsonian and psychopathologic features that set it apart from 'pure' AD (hereafter called AD). In the present preliminary study, 16 dementia patients were prospectively categorized as having DLB versus AD. Subjects were also categorized according to their profile on surface electromyographic (EMG) measures demonstrated in prior work to be analogues of clinically observed parkinsonian extrapyramidal signs (EPS). All patients were prescribed the AChE inhibitor donepezil (5 mg per day). At baseline and at 6 months, patients underwent cognitive testing with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) while caregivers assessed their psychopathologic status using the Behavioral Symptoms in Alzheimer's Disease (BEHAVE-AD) scale. The tester was blinded to the AD versus DLB classification of the patients. AD cases (N=12) had only a slight increase in cognitive scores, while DLB patients' (N=4) mean MMSE scores increased to a significantly greater degree. Furthermore, patients categorized by EMG as EPS positive (N=8) attained an increase in their mean MMSE score from baseline to 6 months that differed significantly from a decline in MMSE observed among their EPS negative (N=4) counterparts. For all subjects, an increase in MMSE scores across 6 months of treatment correlated with a decline in BEHAVE-AD scores.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Samuel, W., Caligiuri, M., Galasko, D., Lacro, J., Marini, M., McClure, F. S., et al. (2000). Better cognitive and psychopathologic response to donepezil in patients prospectively diagnosed as dementia with Lewy bodies: a preliminary study. International journal of geriatric psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1166(200009)15:9<794::aid-gps178>3.0.co;2-1

Vancouver

Samuel W, Caligiuri M, Galasko D, Lacro J, Marini M, McClure FS, et al. Better cognitive and psychopathologic response to donepezil in patients prospectively diagnosed as dementia with Lewy bodies: a preliminary study. International journal of geriatric psychiatry. 2000. doi:10.1002/1099-1166(200009)15:9<794::aid-gps178>3.0.co;2-1. PMID: 10984725.

BibTeX

@article{samuel2000-10984725,
  author  = {Samuel, W. and Caligiuri, M. and Galasko, D. and Lacro, J. and Marini, M. and McClure, F. S. and Warren, K. and Jeste, D. V.},
  title   = {{Better cognitive and psychopathologic response to donepezil in patients prospectively diagnosed as dementia with Lewy bodies: a preliminary study}},
  journal = {International journal of geriatric psychiatry},
  year    = {2000},
  doi     = {10.1002/1099-1166(200009)15:9<794::aid-gps178>3.0.co;2-1},
  pmid    = {10984725},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1166(200009)15:9<794::aid-gps178>3.0.co;2-1}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 45/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 26 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 45 of 100. Total 45 of 100.26 of the 58 points we could judge = 45 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and effect reported because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 45 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (International journal of geriatric psychiatry)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2000 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 1 / 4 12 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 1 / 2 Blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 10984725)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 26 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 45 out of 100.
Total 45 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Treatments from nearby years

Also tagged “response”

5 studies in the library carry the topic tag “response”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 5 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →