Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 67 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background and objectives Hippocampal volume (HV) atrophy is a well-known biomarker of memory impairment. However, compared with β-amyloid (Aβ) and tau imaging, it is less specific for Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology. This lack of specificity could provide indirect information about potential copathologies that cannot be observed in vivo. In this prospective cohort study, we aimed to assess the associations among Aβ, tau, HV, and cognition, measured over a 10-year follow-up period with a special focus on the contributions of HV atrophy to cognition after adjusting for Aβ and tau. Methods We enrolled 283 older adults without dementia or overt cognitive impairment in the Harvard Aging Brain Study. In this report, we only analyzed data from individuals with available longitudinal imaging and cognition data. Serial MRI (follow-up duration 1.3-7.0 years), neocortical Aβ imaging on Pittsburgh Compound B PET scans (1.9-8.5 years), entorhinal and inferior temporal tau on flortaucipir PET scans (0.8-6.0 years), and the Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (3.0-9.8 years) were prospectively collected. We evaluated the longitudinal associations between Aβ, tau, volume, and cognition data and investigated sequential models to test the contribution of each biomarker to cognitive decline. Results We analyzed data from 128 clinically normal older adults, including 72 (56%) women and 56 (44%) men; median age at inclusion was 73 years (range 63-87). Thirty-four participants (27%) exhibited an initial high-Aβ burden on PET imaging. Faster HV atrophy was correlated with faster cognitive decline ( R 2 = 0.28, p < 0.0001). When comparing all biomarkers, HV slope was associated with cognitive decline independently of Aβ and tau measures, uniquely accounting for 10% of the variance. Altogether, 45% of the variance in cognitive decline was explained by combining the change measures in the different imaging biomarkers. Discussion In older adults, longitudinal hippocampal atrophy is associated with cognitive decline, independently of Aβ or tau, suggesting that non-AD pathologies (e.g., TDP-43, vascular) may contribute to hippocampal-mediated cognitive decline. Serial HV measures, in addition to AD-specific biomarkers, may help evaluate the contribution of non-AD pathologies that cannot be measured otherwise in vivo.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Hanseeuw, B. J., Jacobs, H. I. L., Schultz, A. P., Buckley, R. F., Farrell, M. E., Guehl, N. J., et al. (2023). Association of Pathologic and Volumetric Biomarker Changes With Cognitive Decline in Clinically Normal Adults. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000207962

Vancouver

Hanseeuw BJ, Jacobs HIL, Schultz AP, Buckley RF, Farrell ME, Guehl NJ, et al. Association of Pathologic and Volumetric Biomarker Changes With Cognitive Decline in Clinically Normal Adults. Neurology. 2023. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000207962. PMID: 37968130.

BibTeX

@article{hanseeuw2023-37968130,
  author  = {Hanseeuw, B. J. and Jacobs, H. I. L. and Schultz, A. P. and Buckley, R. F. and Farrell, M. E. and Guehl, N. J. and Becker, J. A. and Properzi, M. and others},
  title   = {{Association of Pathologic and Volumetric Biomarker Changes With Cognitive Decline in Clinically Normal Adults}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.1212/wnl.0000000000207962},
  pmid    = {37968130},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000207962}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 67/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 39 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 67 of 100. Total 67 of 100.39 of the 58 points we could judge = 67 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 39 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 67 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 283 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 37968130)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 39 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 39 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 67 out of 100.
Total 67 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Also tagged “clinically-normal”

2 studies in the library carry the topic tag “clinically-normal”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 2 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →