Topic: Genetics and APOE
The apolipoprotein E locus (APOE) is associated with variations in the age of onset and risk of Alzheimer's disease. The APOE4 allele increases the probability of disease at an earlier age. In contrast, the APOE3 and APOE2 alleles decrease the probability of disease and increase the age of onset. Therefore the metabolism of apolipoprotein E is relevant to Alzheimer's disease. Isoform-specific interactions of apolipoprotein E with other molecules may determine the rate of disease expression through molecular pathways that appear unique to the disease. In addition, some isoform-specific interactions of apolipoprotein E have been demonstrated with the defining pathological lesions of Alzheimer's disease, the neurofibrillary tangle and neuritic plaque. Several hypotheses of disease pathogenesis are now based on the relevance of apolipoprotein E.
Key findings
- The apolipoprotein E locus (APOE) is associated with variations in the age of onset and risk of Alzheimer's disease.
- In addition, some isoform-specific interactions of apolipoprotein E have been demonstrated with the defining pathological lesions of Alzheimer's disease, the neurofibrillary tangle and neuritic plaque.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Genetics →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 38/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 38 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Annual review of neuroscience) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 1996 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 8833436) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 21 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 38 out of 100. |
| Total | 38 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Strittmatter, W. J., & Roses, A. D. (1996). Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer's disease. Annual review of neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.000413
Vancouver
Strittmatter WJ, Roses AD. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer's disease. Annual review of neuroscience. 1996. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.000413. PMID: 8833436.
BibTeX
@article{strittmatter1996-8833436,
author = {Strittmatter, W J and Roses, A D},
title = {{Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer's disease}},
journal = {Annual review of neuroscience},
year = {1996},
doi = {10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.000413},
pmid = {8833436},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.000413}
}