Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 66 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Drug trials: efficacy and safety

ARIA-E incidence was 2.0% in non-carriers and 6.2% in εε4/εε4 homozygotes (εε4/εε4-versus-non-carrier OR 3.25, versus 8.49 in Clarity AD and 8.32 in Japan post-marketing surveillance). Any ARIA-H was independently predicted by baseline cerebral microbleeds, white matter hyperintensity (WMH), age, and APOE εε4 allele dose (aORs 1.23, 1.50, 1.04, 1.75). Under genotype-guided escalation, observations are compatible with - but do not establish - attenuation of the APOE εε4-driven ARIA-E gradient, whereas ARIA-H risk reflected baseline cerebrovascular burden. These findings raise the hypothesis of a dual-axis safety framework requiring randomized confirmation.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Kang, H., Jang, H., Ahn, J., Na, D. L., Lee, J.-H., Kim, E.-J., et al. (2026). APOE-guided lecanemab dosing dissociates ARIA-E from ARIA-H: The K-ROAD study. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.71765

Vancouver

Kang H, Jang H, Ahn J, Na DL, Lee J.-H, Kim E.-J, et al. APOE-guided lecanemab dosing dissociates ARIA-E from ARIA-H: The K-ROAD study. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. 2026. doi:10.1002/alz.71765. PMID: 42642841.

BibTeX

@article{kang2026-42642841,
  author  = {Kang, Heekyoung and Jang, Hyemin and Ahn, Jehyun and Na, Duk L and Lee, Jae-Hong and Kim, Eun-Joo and Chun, Min Young and Cho, Soo Hyun and others},
  title   = {{APOE-guided lecanemab dosing dissociates ARIA-E from ARIA-H: The K-ROAD study}},
  journal = {Alzheimer's \& dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz.71765},
  pmid    = {42642841},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.71765}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 66/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 39 of the 59 points it could be judged on, which is 66 of 100. Total 66 of 100.39 of the 59 points we could judge = 66 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 39 of the 59 points we could judge it on, which is 66 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (pubmed indexes it as a clinical or observational study)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 PubMed indexes it as a multicentre study
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 42642841)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 39 / 59 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 39 of the 59 points we could judge it on is 66 out of 100.
Total 66 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “aducanumab”

332 studies in the library carry the topic tag “aducanumab”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 332 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →