Home › Research › Inflammation and the immune system
Anti-inflammatory Effect of AZD6244 on Acrolein-Induced Neuroinflammation
Wen-Chien Ho, Chia-Chi Hsu, Hui-Ju Huang, Hsiang-Tsui Wang, Anya Maan-Yuh Lin. Molecular neurobiology, 2019-11-30
Topic: Inflammation, microglia and astrocytes
Clinically, high levels of acrolein (a highly reactive α, β-unsaturated aldehyde) and acrolein adducts are detected in the brain of patients with CNS neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease and spinal cord injury. Our previous study supports this notion by showing acrolein as a neurotoxin in a Parkinsonian animal model. In the present study, the effect of AZD6244 (an ATP non-competitive MEK1/2 inhibitor) on acrolein-induced neuroinflammation was investigated using BV-2 cells and primary cultured microglia. Our immunostaining study showed that lipopolysaccharide (LPS, an inflammation inducer as a positive control) increased co-localized immunoreactivities of phosphorylated ERK and ED-1 (a biomarker of activated microglia) in the treated BV-2 cells. Similar elevation in co-localized immunoreactivities of phosphorylated ERK and ED-1 was detected in the acrolein-treated BV-2 cells. Furthermore, Western blot assay showed increases in phosphorylated ERK in BV-2 cells subjected to LPS (1 μg/mL) or acrolein (30 μM); these increases were blocked by AZD6244 (10 μM). At the same time, AZD6244 attenuated LPS-induced TNF-α (a pro-inflammatory cytokine) and cyclooxygenase-II (COX II, a pro-inflammatory enzyme). Consistently, AZD6244 reduced acrolein-induced elevations in COX-II mRNA and COX-II protein expression. In addition, AZD6244 inhibited acrolein-induced increases in activated caspase 1 (a biomarker of inflammasome activation) and heme oxygenase-1 (a redox-regulated chaperone protein) in BV-2 cells. Using a transwell migration assay, AZD6244 attenuated acrolein (5 μM)-induced migration of BV-2 cells and primary cultured microglia. In conclusion, our study shows that acrolein is capable of inducing neuroinflammation which involved ERK activation in microglia. Furthermore, AZD6244 is capable of inhibiting acrolein-induced neuroinflammation. Our study suggests that ERK inhibition may be a neuroprotective target against acrolein-induced neuroinflammation in the CNS neurodegenerative diseases.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Ho, W.-C., Hsu, C.-C., Huang, H.-J., Wang, H.-T., & Lin, A. M.-Y. (2020). Anti-inflammatory Effect of AZD6244 on Acrolein-Induced Neuroinflammation. Molecular neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-019-01758-8
Vancouver
Ho W.-C, Hsu C.-C, Huang H.-J, Wang H.-T, Lin AM.-Y. Anti-inflammatory Effect of AZD6244 on Acrolein-Induced Neuroinflammation. Molecular neurobiology. 2020. doi:10.1007/s12035-019-01758-8. PMID: 31786775.
BibTeX
@article{ho2020-31786775,
author = {Ho, Wen-Chien and Hsu, Chia-Chi and Huang, Hui-Ju and Wang, Hsiang-Tsui and Lin, Anya Maan-Yuh},
title = {{Anti-inflammatory Effect of AZD6244 on Acrolein-Induced Neuroinflammation}},
journal = {Molecular neurobiology},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.1007/s12035-019-01758-8},
pmid = {31786775},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-019-01758-8}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Our immunostaining study showed that lipopolysaccharide (LPS, an inflammation inducer as a positive control) increased co-localized immunoreactivities of phosphorylated ERK and ED-1 (a biomarker of activated microglia) in the treated BV-2 cells.
- In conclusion, our study shows that acrolein is capable of inducing neuroinflammation which involved ERK activation in microglia.
- Our study suggests that ERK inhibition may be a neuroprotective target against acrolein-induced neuroinflammation in the CNS neurodegenerative diseases.
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 39/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multicenter collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 22 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 39 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Molecular neurobiology) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 31786775) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 22 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 22 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 39 out of 100. |
| Total | 39 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Inflammation and the immune system
Also tagged “inflammasome”
384 studies in the library carry the topic tag “inflammasome”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 384 tagged studies.