Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 63 out of 100. Disease mechanisms

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Researchers extracted soluble amyloid-beta protein oligomers directly from the cerebral cortex of subjects with Alzheimer's disease to study their impact. They discovered that these oligomers inhibited long-term potentiation, enhanced long-term depression, reduced dendritic spine density, and disrupted memory in normal rodents. The findings indicate that soluble oligomers extracted from Alzheimer's brains impair synapse structure and function, with dimers acting as the smallest synaptotoxic species.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Shankar, G. M., Li, S., Mehta, T., García-Muñoz, A., Shepardson, N. E., Smith, I. M., et al. (2008). Amyloid-β protein dimers isolated directly from Alzheimer's brains impair synaptic plasticity and memory. Nature Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1782

Vancouver

Shankar GM, Li S, Mehta T, García-Muñoz A, Shepardson NE, Smith IM, et al. Amyloid-β protein dimers isolated directly from Alzheimer's brains impair synaptic plasticity and memory. Nature Medicine. 2008. doi:10.1038/nm1782. PMID: 18568035.

BibTeX

@article{shankar2008-18568035,
  author  = {Shankar, Ganesh M. and Li, Shaomin and Mehta, Tapan and García-Muñoz, Amaya and Shepardson, Nina E. and Smith, Imelda M. and Brett, Francesca M. and Farrell, Michael Anthony and Rowan, Michael J. and Lemere, Cynthia Ann and Regan, Ciaran M. and Walsh, Dominic M. and Sabatini, Bernardo Luis and Selkoe, Dennis J.},
  title   = {{Amyloid-β protein dimers isolated directly from Alzheimer's brains impair synaptic plasticity and memory}},
  journal = {Nature Medicine},
  year    = {2008},
  doi     = {10.1038/nm1782},
  pmid    = {18568035},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1782}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 14 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Reports that amyloid-beta protein dimers taken directly from Alzheimer's brains impaired synaptic plasticity and memory.

How this study scored 63/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 10 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence left out, no data; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 7 of 7; Citations per year 5 of 5; Impact for its field and year 6 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 4 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 60 of the 95 points it could be judged on, which is 63 of 100. Total 63 of 100.60 of the 95 points we could judge = 63 of 100

Published in a top-tier journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on strength of evidence, so that was left out: it earned 60 of the 95 points we could judge it on, which is 63 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 10 / 10 Tier 1 — top-tier general journal (Nature Medicine)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Nature Medicine: journal h-index 763 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence — / 5 No evidence rating recorded — left out of this score
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2008 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 7 / 7 Cited 3,686 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 5 / 5 184.3 citations a year over 20 year(s) since 2008
Impact for its field and year 6 / 6 Cited 152.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 4 / 4 Cited 398 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Dennis J. Selkoe: h-index 174 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Harvard University: institution h-index 3,235 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 6 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 18568035)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 60 / 95 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 60 of the 95 points we could judge it on is 63 out of 100.
Total 63 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Disease mechanisms

Also tagged “precursor”

1,337 studies in the library carry the topic tag “precursor”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,337 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Disease mechanisms

See all studies in Disease mechanisms →