Home › Research › Biomarkers
Amyloid-beta peptide and oligomers in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid of aged canines
Head E, Pop V, Sarsoza F, Kayed R, Beckett TL, Studzinski CM, Tomic JL, Glabe CG et al.. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2010-01-01
Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers
The study of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis requires the use of animal models that develop some amount of amyloid pathology in the brain. Aged canines (beagles) naturally accumulate human-type amyloid-beta peptide (Abeta) and develop parallel declines in cognitive function. However, the type and quantity of biochemically extracted Abeta in brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), its link to aging, and similarity to human aging has not been examined systematically. Thirty beagles, aged 4.5-15.7 years, were studied. Abeta40 and Abeta42 were measured in CSF by ELISA, and from SDS and formic acid extracted prefrontal cortex. A sample of the contralateral hemisphere, used to assess immunohistochemical amyloid load, was used for comparison. In the brain, increases in Abeta42 were detected at a younger age, prior to increases in Abeta40, and were correlated with an increased amyloid load. In the CSF, Abeta42 decreased with age while Abeta40 levels remained constant. The CSF Abeta42/40 ratio was also a good predictor of the amount of Abeta in the brain. The amount of soluble oligomers in CSF was inversely related to brain extractable Abeta, whereas oligomers in the brain were correlated with SDS soluble Abeta42. These findings indicate that the Abeta in the brain of the aged canine exhibits patterns that mirror Abeta deposited in the human brain. These parallels support the idea that the aged canine is a useful intermediate between transgenic mice and humans for studying the development of amyloid pathology and is a potentially useful model for the refinement of therapeutic interventions.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Head, E., Pop, V., Sarsoza, F., Kayed, R., Beckett, T. L., Studzinski, C. M., et al. (2010). Amyloid-beta peptide and oligomers in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid of aged canines. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-2010-1397
Vancouver
Head E, Pop V, Sarsoza F, Kayed R, Beckett TL, Studzinski CM, et al. Amyloid-beta peptide and oligomers in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid of aged canines. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD. 2010. doi:10.3233/jad-2010-1397. PMID: 20164551.
BibTeX
@article{head2010-20164551,
author = {Head, E. and Pop, V. and Sarsoza, F. and Kayed, R. and Beckett, T. L. and Studzinski, C. M. and Tomic, J. L. and Glabe, C. G. and others},
title = {{Amyloid-beta peptide and oligomers in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid of aged canines}},
journal = {Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD},
year = {2010},
doi = {10.3233/jad-2010-1397},
pmid = {20164551},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-2010-1397}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- These findings indicate that the Abeta in the brain of the aged canine exhibits patterns that mirror Abeta deposited in the human brain.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Blood tests & biomarkers →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2010 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 20164551) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 21 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100. |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Biomarkers
Also tagged “presenilin”
344 studies in the library carry the topic tag “presenilin”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 344 tagged studies.