Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 45 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

The logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) has been associated with Alzheimer disease, although this relationship is still subject to debate. The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency of amyloid biomarkers in patients with lvPPA, and record any potential clinical or topographic differences between patients with and without amyloid deposits. We conducted cognitive examination and positron-emission tomography studies with fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F) and florbetapir ((18)F) in a cohort of 16 patients diagnosed with lvPPA. We evaluated the prevalence of amyloid deposits as well as any clinical and metabolic differences between the groups with and without significant presence of amyloid deposits. Eleven patients (69 %) were considered amyloid-positive. The amyloid-positive group displayed less metabolic activity in the left temporoparietal region than the control group, while the amyloid-negative group showed lower metabolism in the left temporoparietal region extending to the anterior temporal and basal frontal regions. The percentage of change in patients with clinical and FDG-PET follow-up did not differ between the amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative subgroups. The frequency of amyloid-positive cases confirms that lvPPA is frequently associated with Alzheimer disease. Amyloid-negative patients show a different cerebral metabolic pattern. These findings show the relevance of using amyloid PET to study lvPPA, and also suggest that the logopenic variant may not be specific to Alzheimer disease in certain cases.

Key findings

Why it matters

Among 16 patients with logopenic primary progressive aphasia, 11 were amyloid-positive, and the amyloid-negative patients showed a different pattern of brain metabolism. This supports using amyloid PET to identify which of these patients have Alzheimer's-related pathology, but it does not test any treatment, cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 45/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 45 of 100.45 of 100 points earned55 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of neurology)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Journal of Neurology: journal h-index 208 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2015 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 16 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 47 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.6 citations a year over 13 year(s) since 2015
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 4 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Jorge Matías‐Guiu: h-index 50 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Universidad Complutense de Madrid: institution h-index 656 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 25860346)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 45 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 10 Oct 2026), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Matías-Guiu, J. A., Cabrera-Martín, M. N., Moreno-Ramos, T., Valles-Salgado, M., Fernandez-Matarrubia, M., Carreras, J. L., et al. (2015). Amyloid and FDG-PET study of logopenic primary progressive aphasia: evidence for the existence of two subtypes. Journal of neurology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-7738-z

Vancouver

Matías-Guiu JA, Cabrera-Martín MN, Moreno-Ramos T, Valles-Salgado M, Fernandez-Matarrubia M, Carreras JL, et al. Amyloid and FDG-PET study of logopenic primary progressive aphasia: evidence for the existence of two subtypes. Journal of neurology. 2015. doi:10.1007/s00415-015-7738-z. PMID: 25860346.

BibTeX

@article{matiasguiu2015-25860346,
  author  = {Matías-Guiu, J. A. and Cabrera-Martín, M. N. and Moreno-Ramos, T. and Valles-Salgado, M. and Fernandez-Matarrubia, M. and Carreras, J. L. and Matías-Guiu, J.},
  title   = {{Amyloid and FDG-PET study of logopenic primary progressive aphasia: evidence for the existence of two subtypes}},
  journal = {Journal of neurology},
  year    = {2015},
  doi     = {10.1007/s00415-015-7738-z},
  pmid    = {25860346},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-7738-z}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

4 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →