Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100. Clinical safety

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The optimized XGBoost model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an AUC of 0.85. Key hyperparameters included min_child_weight = 1, max_depth = 5, gamma = 0.3, subsample = 0.9, colsample_bytree = 0.7, reg_alpha = 0.0007, learning_rate = 0.14, and n_estimators = 123. The model exhibited an accuracy of 0.926, recall of 0.945, precision of 0.934, and an F1-score of 0.939, depicting a higher level of predictive accuracy & balance between sensitivity and specificity. This study proposes a strong XGBoost-based model to predict POD in older surgical patients, demonstrating the potential of Machine Learning (ML) in clinical risk assessment. With the help of the model's balanced performance indicators and high accuracy, physicians may identify high-risk patients and promptly execute interventions in clinical settings. Subsequent investigations ought to concentrate on integration into clinical workflows and external validation.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Boppana, S. H., Tyagi, D., Komati, S. S. K., Boppana, S. L., Raj, R., & Mintz, C. D. (2025). AI-delirium guard: Predictive modeling of postoperative delirium in elderly surgical patients. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322032

Vancouver

Boppana SH, Tyagi D, Komati SSK, Boppana SL, Raj R, Mintz CD. AI-delirium guard: Predictive modeling of postoperative delirium in elderly surgical patients. PLoS ONE. 2025. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0322032. PMID: 40471913.

BibTeX

@article{boppana2025-40471913,
  author  = {Boppana, Sri Harsha and Tyagi, Divyansh and Komati, Sachin Sravan Kumar and Boppana, Sri Lasya and Raj, Ritwik and Mintz, Cyrus David},
  title   = {{AI-delirium guard: Predictive modeling of postoperative delirium in elderly surgical patients}},
  journal = {PLoS ONE},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1371/journal.pone.0322032},
  pmid    = {40471913},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322032}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study developed an XGBoost machine learning model that predicted postoperative delirium in older surgical patients with an AUC of 0.85 and high accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score. The authors say physicians may use it to identify high-risk patients and promptly execute interventions, but it concerns delirium prediction, not treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 50/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 50 of 100.50 of 100 points earned50 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (PLoS ONE)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 PLoS ONE: journal h-index 594 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 17,000 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 10 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 7.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 10 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Cyrus David Mintz: h-index 18 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Johns Hopkins University: institution h-index 2,306 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40471913)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 50 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Clinical safety

Also tagged “palliative”

858 studies in the library carry the topic tag “palliative”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 858 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Clinical safety

See all studies in Clinical safety →