Home › Research › Clinical safety
Enhancing Delirium Prediction and Prevention in Elderly Patients Through Machine Learning-Based Analysis
Abdullah Mohammed Al Alawi, Juhaina Salim Al-Maqbali. Sultan Qaboos University medical journal, 2025-06-13
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
A total of 327 patients were included in this study. The random forest model demonstrated the best performance, achieving an accuracy of 96.9%, an F1 score of 97.2%, and an AUC-ROC of 98.4%. Cross-validation confirmed the model's stability. Feature importance analysis identified acute kidney injury, respiratory failure, dementia, stroke and decompensated heart failure as the most influential predictors of delirium. ML models, particularly the random forest model, exhibited strong predictive performance in identifying patients at risk of delirium within 24 hours of admission. These findings support the potential of ML in enhancing early delirium detection and guiding targeted preventive strategies. Future research should focus on external validation to confirm the model's applicability across different healthcare settings.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Alawi, A. M. A., & Al-Maqbali, J. S. (2025). Enhancing Delirium Prediction and Prevention in Elderly Patients Through Machine Learning-Based Analysis. Sultan Qaboos University medical journal. https://doi.org/10.18295/2075-0528.2869
Vancouver
Alawi AMA, Al-Maqbali JS. Enhancing Delirium Prediction and Prevention in Elderly Patients Through Machine Learning-Based Analysis. Sultan Qaboos University medical journal. 2025. doi:10.18295/2075-0528.2869. PMID: 40717924.
BibTeX
@article{alawi2025-40717924,
author = {Alawi, Abdullah Mohammed Al and Al-Maqbali, Juhaina Salim},
title = {{Enhancing Delirium Prediction and Prevention in Elderly Patients Through Machine Learning-Based Analysis}},
journal = {Sultan Qaboos University medical journal},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.18295/2075-0528.2869},
pmid = {40717924},
url = {https://doi.org/10.18295/2075-0528.2869}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- A total of 327 patients were included in this study.
- The random forest model demonstrated the best performance, achieving an accuracy of 96.9%, an F1 score of 97.2%, and an AUC-ROC of 98.4%.
- Cross-validation confirmed the model's stability.
- Feature importance analysis identified acute kidney injury, respiratory failure, dementia, stroke and decompensated heart failure as the most influential predictors of delirium.
- ML models, particularly the random forest model, exhibited strong predictive performance in identifying patients at risk of delirium within 24 hours of admission.
Why it matters
This cohort study of 327 patients found that a machine learning model could predict delirium within 24 hours of admission, with dementia among the most influential predictors. It is about predicting delirium, not about treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.
Study details
- Study designcohort study
- Participants327
- Effect size96.9%; 97.2%; 98.4%
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 47/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Sultan Qaboos University medical journal) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | Sultan Qaboos University medical journal: journal h-index 56 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 7 / 12 | A cohort study following people over time |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 327 participants |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 1 / 7 | Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 0 / 5 | 0.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025 |
| Impact for its field and year | 2 / 6 | Cited 1.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 0 / 4 | Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 1 / 4 | Last-listed author Juhaina Salim Al-Maqbali: h-index 11 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 0 / 3 | Sultan Qaboos University: institution h-index 284 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 1 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40717924) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 47 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.18295/2075-0528.2869
- PubMed: 40717924
- Original source →
- Free full text: Sultan Qaboos University medical journal →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Related studies in Clinical safety
Also tagged “delirium”
858 studies in the library carry the topic tag “delirium”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 858 tagged studies.