Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 55 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

AD exhibited elevated serum GFAP levels in comparison to control patients (P < 0.0001). This remained the case when the newly generated age-corrected z-scores were applied (P < 0.0001). In the control cohort, a nonlinear elevation of serum GFAP with increasing age was observed (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.62, 95% CI 0.58-0.66, P < 0.0001). In contrast, the AD cohort exhibited a more linear increase (0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.26, P = 0.004). Age-dependent cut-offs for serum GFAP were determined for different AD age groups. The calculated areas under the curve (AUCs; 0.97) demonstrated excellent diagnostic test performance in the early-onset age group. This effect was less marked in the elderly subjects (AUC 0.72). Our novel GFAP z-scores enable the integration and interpretation of serum GFAP levels in clinical practice, moving from the group to individual level. They support both intra- and interindividual interpretation of single GFAP levels in neurological diseases with astrocytic pathology, including an accurate discrimination of AD.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Halbgebauer, S., Fazeli, B., Klose, V., Nagel, G., Rosenbohm, A., Rothenbacher, D., et al. (2025). Age-Specific Control and Alzheimer Disease Reference Curves and z -Scores for Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in Blood. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf120

Vancouver

Halbgebauer S, Fazeli B, Klose V, Nagel G, Rosenbohm A, Rothenbacher D, et al. Age-Specific Control and Alzheimer Disease Reference Curves and z -Scores for Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in Blood. Clinical Chemistry. 2025. doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvaf120. PMID: 41081630.

BibTeX

@article{halbgebauer2025-41081630,
  author  = {Halbgebauer, Steffen and Fazeli, Badrieh and Klose, Veronika and Nagel, Gabriele and Rosenbohm, Angela and Rothenbacher, Dietrich and Bachhuber, Franziska and Jesse, Sarah and others},
  title   = {{Age-Specific Control and Alzheimer Disease Reference Curves and z -Scores for Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in Blood}},
  journal = {Clinical Chemistry},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1093/clinchem/hvaf120},
  pmid    = {41081630},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf120}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Serum GFAP was elevated in Alzheimer's disease compared with controls, and age-corrected z-scores and cut-offs were developed, with better diagnostic performance in early-onset than elderly groups. This is a diagnostic tool and does not address treating, curing or preventing the disease.

Study details

How this study scored 55/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 55 of 100.55 of 100 points earned45 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Clinical Chemistry)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Clinical Chemistry: journal h-index 323 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 1,273 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 9 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 9 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Hayrettin Tumani: h-index 41 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of California, San Francisco: institution h-index 1,915 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 8 institution(s) in 3 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41081630)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 55 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “cerebrospinal”

821 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cerebrospinal”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 821 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →