Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 55 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

< 0.001). Stage-specific tau-PET region-of-interest selection reduced required sample sizes by 30%-93% for detecting hypothetical disease-modifying drug effects. Stage-specific patterns of tau-PET change highlighted the importance of baseline biological AD staging for selecting outcome regions of interest. Statistical power analyses indicated that aligning outcome regions with disease stage reduced sample size estimates, suggesting potential gains in trial efficiency. While findings were consistent across 2 independent cohorts, differences in tracers and demographic composition represent key limitations.

Key findings

Why it matters

Selecting tau-PET regions based on biological disease stage reduced the sample sizes needed to detect hypothetical drug effects by 30% to 93%. This is a trial-design finding and does not show that any treatment works.

Study details

How this study scored 55/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 53 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 55 of 100. Total 55 of 100.53 of the 96 points we could judge = 55 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 53 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 55 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Neurology: journal h-index 525 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 10 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 6.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 2 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 10 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Pittsburgh: institution h-index 1,470 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40986433)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 53 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 53 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 55 out of 100.
Total 55 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Trudel, L., Therriault, J., Macedo, A. C., Servaes, S., Hosseini, S. A., Bezgin, G., et al. (2025). Implication for Clinical Trials From Longitudinal Tau-PET Accumulation Across Biological Alzheimer Disease Stages. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000214111

Vancouver

Trudel L, Therriault J, Macedo AC, Servaes S, Hosseini SA, Bezgin G, et al. Implication for Clinical Trials From Longitudinal Tau-PET Accumulation Across Biological Alzheimer Disease Stages. Neurology. 2025. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000214111. PMID: 40986433.

BibTeX

@article{trudel2025-40986433,
  author  = {Trudel, Lydia and Therriault, Joseph and Macedo, Arthur C. and Servaes, Stijn and Hosseini, Seyyed Ali and Bezgin, Gleb and Aumont, Étienne and Rahmouni, Nesrine and others},
  title   = {{Implication for Clinical Trials From Longitudinal Tau-PET Accumulation Across Biological Alzheimer Disease Stages}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1212/wnl.0000000000214111},
  pmid    = {40986433},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000214111}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 14.

Later studies that cite this one

2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “phosphorylated”

732 studies in the library carry the topic tag “phosphorylated”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 732 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →