Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100. Tau biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Objective: To evaluate the consistency of measurement results and diagnostic agreement of core cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for Alzheimer disease (AD) in a Chinese population, which were measured across a domestically developed electrochemiluminescence platform (Lifotronic eCL8000), a Japanese chemiluminescence immunoassay platform (LUMIPULSE), and an American electrochemiluminescence platform (Meso Scale Discovery, MSD). Methods: CSF samples were retrospectively collected from 253 subjects recruited at Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, and Beijing Tiantan Hospital between July 2013 and September 2019. The cohort was comprised of 132 males and 121 females, with the age of (62.4±13.3) years.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Tian, C., Wang, Z. Y., Liu, S. Y., Kang, X. X., Yu, Z. W., Pan, D. H., et al. (2026). [Consistency evaluation of the domestic Lifotronic platform and foreign luminescence platforms in detecting core cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Chinese Alzheimer disease patients]. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20260414-01014

Vancouver

Tian C, Wang ZY, Liu SY, Kang XX, Yu ZW, Pan DH, et al. [Consistency evaluation of the domestic Lifotronic platform and foreign luminescence platforms in detecting core cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Chinese Alzheimer disease patients]. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi. 2026. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20260414-01014. PMID: 42402882.

BibTeX

@article{tian2026-42402882,
  author  = {Tian, C. and Wang, Z. Y. and Liu, S. Y. and Kang, X. X. and Yu, Z. W. and Pan, D. H. and Guo, Z. and Qiao, H. W. and others},
  title   = {{[Consistency evaluation of the domestic Lifotronic platform and foreign luminescence platforms in detecting core cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Chinese Alzheimer disease patients]}},
  journal = {Zhonghua yi xue za zhi},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20260414-01014},
  pmid    = {42402882},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20260414-01014}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Using cerebrospinal fluid from 253 subjects, this study evaluated whether a domestic Lifotronic platform, a Japanese LUMIPULSE platform, and an American Meso Scale Discovery platform gave consistent results for core Alzheimer's disease cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. It is a measurement comparison and does not test treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 43/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 37 of the 86 points it could be judged on, which is 43 of 100. Total 43 of 100.37 of the 86 points we could judge = 43 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, impact for its field and year and senior author's track record, so those were left out: it earned 37 of the 86 points we could judge it on, which is 43 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Zhonghua yi xue za zhi)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 253 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author J Zhang holds only 1 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Zhejiang University: institution h-index 1,040 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 7 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 42402882)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 37 / 86 Scored on 17 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 37 of the 86 points we could judge it on is 43 out of 100.
Total 43 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Tau biomarkers

Also tagged “cerebrospinal”

821 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cerebrospinal”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 821 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Tau biomarkers

See all studies in Tau biomarkers →