Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 54 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background and purpose Recently, some emerging cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers have been proposed as diagnostic tools for Alzheimer disease (AD) that can have an effect on disease progression. We analyze the accuracy of these CSF markers for diagnosis of AD in reference to brain amyloid positron emission tomography (PET). We also investigated whether they help in differentiating AD from other dementias and examined their influence in tracing the progression to dementia. Methods Amyloid-β (Aβ) 1-42, total tau (t-tau), phosphorylated tau, Aβ 40 , Aβ 38 , beta-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE-1), neurogranin (ng), phosphorylated neurofilament heavy-chain, and α-synuclein (α-syn) CSF levels were analyzed in 319 subjects, among whom 57 also underwent an amyloid PET scan. We also analyzed longitudinal clinical data from 239 subjects. Results Emerging CSF markers, especially ng/BACE-1 ratio (area under the curve = 0.77) and their combinations with core AD CSF markers (all AUCs >0.85), showed high accuracy to discriminate amyloid PET positivity. Subjects with AD had higher CSF BACE-1, ng, and α-syn levels than those with non-AD dementia. CSF t-tau/α-syn ratio was higher in subjects with dementia with Lewy bodies than in those with frontotemporal dementia. Most emerging/core AD ratios predicted a faster conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage to AD and appeared to be helpful when core AD CSF markers were discordant. In addition, the rate of cognitive decline was associated with all CSF core AD markers, several emerging/core AD two-marker ratios, and CSF ng levels. Conclusions These results suggest that emerging biomarkers in conjunction with core AD markers improve diagnosis of AD, are associated with the conversion from MCI into AD, and predict a faster progression of dementia.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Álvarez, I., Diez-Fairen, M., Aguilar, M., González, J. M., Ysamat, M., Tartari, J. P., et al. (2021). Added value of cerebrospinal fluid multimarker analysis in diagnosis and progression of dementia. European journal of neurology. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14658

Vancouver

Álvarez I, Diez-Fairen M, Aguilar M, González JM, Ysamat M, Tartari JP, et al. Added value of cerebrospinal fluid multimarker analysis in diagnosis and progression of dementia. European journal of neurology. 2021. doi:10.1111/ene.14658. PMID: 33236496.

BibTeX

@article{alvarez2021-33236496,
  author  = {Álvarez, I. and Diez-Fairen, M. and Aguilar, M. and González, J. M. and Ysamat, M. and Tartari, J. P. and Carcel, M. and Alonso, A. and others},
  title   = {{Added value of cerebrospinal fluid multimarker analysis in diagnosis and progression of dementia}},
  journal = {European journal of neurology},
  year    = {2021},
  doi     = {10.1111/ene.14658},
  pmid    = {33236496},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14658}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Combining newer CSF markers with core Alzheimer's markers improved accuracy in identifying amyloid PET positivity and some ratios predicted faster conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's. These findings are about improving diagnosis and tracking progression, not about treating, curing, or preventing the disease.

Study details

How this study scored 54/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 54 of 100.54 of 100 points earned46 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (European journal of neurology)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 European Journal of Neurology: journal h-index 181 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 319 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 16 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.3 citations a year over 7 year(s) since 2021
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 3 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 7 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Pau Pástor: h-index 69 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Emory University: institution h-index 1,360 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 3 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 33236496)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 54 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 10 Oct 2026), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 16.

Later studies that cite this one

3 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “cerebrospinal”

821 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cerebrospinal”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 821 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →