Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 75 out of 100. Caregiving

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) p-tau181 (tau phosphorylated at threonine 181) is an established biomarker of Alzheimer's disease (AD), reflecting abnormal tau metabolism in the brain. Here we investigate the performance of CSF p-tau217 as a biomarker of AD in comparison to p-tau181. In the Swedish BioFINDER cohort (n = 194), p-tau217 shows stronger correlations with the tau positron emission tomography (PET) tracer [ 18 F]flortaucipir, and more accurately identifies individuals with abnormally increased [ 18 F]flortaucipir retention. Furthermore, longitudinal increases in p-tau217 are higher compared to p-tau181 and better correlate with [ 18 F]flortaucipir uptake. P-tau217 correlates better than p-tau181 with CSF and PET measures of neocortical amyloid-β burden and more accurately distinguishes AD dementia from non-AD neurodegenerative disorders. Higher correlations between p-tau217 and [ 18 F]flortaucipir are corroborated in an independent EXPEDITION3 trial cohort (n = 32). The main results are validated using a different p-tau217 immunoassay. These findings suggest that p-tau217 might be more useful than p-tau181 in the diagnostic work up of AD.

Key findings

Why it matters

In 194 people from Sweden's BioFINDER study, the spinal-fluid marker p-tau217 tracked tau and amyloid brain scans more closely than the established marker p-tau181, rose more over time, and better separated Alzheimer's dementia from other neurodegenerative disorders. The tau-scan finding held in a second, independent group of 32 people, and the main results held with a different p-tau217 test kit. The authors conclude only that p-tau217 "might be more useful than p-tau181 in the diagnostic work up of AD"; the record gives no accuracy figures, and this is a lumbar-puncture test about detection, not a blood test or a treatment finding.

Study details

How this study scored 75/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 5 of 5; Impact for its field and year 5 of 6; Cited by studies here 4 of 6; Still being cited 4 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 75 of 100.75 of 100 points earned25 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Nature communications)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Nature Communications: journal h-index 747 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 194 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 447 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 5 / 5 55.9 citations a year over 8 year(s) since 2020
Impact for its field and year 5 / 6 Cited 38.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 4 / 6 Cited by 54 other studies in this library
Still being cited 4 / 4 Cited 204 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Oskar Hansson: h-index 148 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Lund University: institution h-index 1,119 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 3 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 32246036)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 75 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Janelidze, S., Stomrud, E., Smith, R., Palmqvist, S., Mattsson, N., Airey, D. C., et al. (2020). Cerebrospinal fluid p-tau217 performs better than p-tau181 as a biomarker of Alzheimer's disease. Nature communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15436-0

Vancouver

Janelidze S, Stomrud E, Smith R, Palmqvist S, Mattsson N, Airey DC, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid p-tau217 performs better than p-tau181 as a biomarker of Alzheimer's disease. Nature communications. 2020. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15436-0. PMID: 32246036.

BibTeX

@article{janelidze2020-32246036,
  author  = {Janelidze, S. and Stomrud, E. and Smith, R. and Palmqvist, S. and Mattsson, N. and Airey, D. C. and Proctor, N. K. and Chai, X. and others},
  title   = {{Cerebrospinal fluid p-tau217 performs better than p-tau181 as a biomarker of Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {Nature communications},
  year    = {2020},
  doi     = {10.1038/s41467-020-15436-0},
  pmid    = {32246036},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15436-0}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 38.

Later studies that cite this one

54 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Caregiving

Also tagged “biomarkers”

821 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biomarkers”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 821 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Caregiving

See all studies in Caregiving →