Home › Research › Biomarkers
Acetylcholinesterase-Abeta complexes are more toxic than Abeta fibrils in rat hippocampus: effect on rat beta-amyloid aggregation, laminin expression, reactive astrocytosis, and neuronal cell loss
Reyes AE, Chacón MA, Dinamarca MC, Cerpa W, Morgan C, Inestrosa NC.. The American journal of pathology, 2004-06-01
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Plain-language summary
Neuropathological changes generated by human amyloid-beta peptide (Abeta) fibrils and Abeta-acetylcholinesterase (Abeta-AChE) complexes were compared in rat hippocampus in vivo. Results showed that Abeta-AChE complexes trigger a more dramatic response in situ than Abeta fibrils alone as characterized by the following features observed 8 weeks after treatment: 1). amyloid deposits were larger than those produced in the absence of AChE. In fact, AChE strongly stimulates rat Abeta aggregation in vitro as shown by turbidity measurements, Congo Red binding, as well as electron microscopy, suggesting that Abeta-AChE deposits observed in vivo probably recruited endogenous Abeta peptide; 2). the appearance of laminin expressing neurons surrounding Abeta-AChE deposits (such deposits are resistant to disaggregation by laminin in vitro); 3). an extensive astrocytosis revealed by both glial fibrillary acidic protein immunoreactivity and number counting of reactive hypertrophic astrocytes; and 4). a stronger neuronal cell loss in comparison with Abeta-injected animals. We conclude that the hippocampal injection of Abeta-AChE complexes results in the appearance of some features reminiscent of Alzheimer-like lesions in rat brain. Our studies are consistent with the notion that Abeta-AChE complexes are more toxic than Abeta fibrils and that AChE triggered some of the neurodegenerative changes observed in Alzheimer's disease brains.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Reyes, A. E., Chacón, M. A., Dinamarca, M. C., Cerpa, W., Morgan, C., & Inestrosa, N. C. (2004). Acetylcholinesterase-Abeta complexes are more toxic than Abeta fibrils in rat hippocampus: effect on rat beta-amyloid aggregation, laminin expression, reactive astrocytosis, and neuronal cell loss. The American journal of pathology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63774-1
Vancouver
Reyes AE, Chacón MA, Dinamarca MC, Cerpa W, Morgan C, Inestrosa NC. Acetylcholinesterase-Abeta complexes are more toxic than Abeta fibrils in rat hippocampus: effect on rat beta-amyloid aggregation, laminin expression, reactive astrocytosis, and neuronal cell loss. The American journal of pathology. 2004. doi:10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63774-1. PMID: 15161650.
BibTeX
@article{reyes2004-15161650,
author = {Reyes, A. E. and Chacón, M. A. and Dinamarca, M. C. and Cerpa, W. and Morgan, C. and Inestrosa, N. C.},
title = {{Acetylcholinesterase-Abeta complexes are more toxic than Abeta fibrils in rat hippocampus: effect on rat beta-amyloid aggregation, laminin expression, reactive astrocytosis, and neuronal cell loss}},
journal = {The American journal of pathology},
year = {2004},
doi = {10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63774-1},
pmid = {15161650},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63774-1}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Results showed that Abeta-AChE complexes trigger a more dramatic response in situ than Abeta fibrils alone as characterized by the following features observed 8 weeks after treatment: 1). amyloid deposits were larger than those produced in the absence of AChE.
- In fact, AChE strongly stimulates rat Abeta aggregation in vitro as shown by turbidity measurements, Congo Red binding, as well as electron microscopy, suggesting that Abeta-AChE deposits observed in vivo probably recruited endogenous Abeta peptide; 2). the appearance of laminin expressing neurons surrounding Abeta-AChE deposits (such deposits are resistant to disaggregation by laminin in vitro); 3). an extensive astrocytosis revealed by both glial fibrillary acidic protein immunoreactivity and number counting of reactive hypertrophic astrocytes; and 4). a stronger neuronal cell loss in comparison with Abeta-injected animals.
- We conclude that the hippocampal injection of Abeta-AChE complexes results in the appearance of some features reminiscent of Alzheimer-like lesions in rat brain.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Blood tests & biomarkers →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The American journal of pathology) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2004 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Laboratory or animal study (title names “rat”) — scores zero |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 15161650) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 21 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100. |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.