Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 44 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

ObjectivePlasma p-Tau217 leaves 30-50% of patients in an indeterminate "gray zone" often requiring A{beta}-PET. We developed GRAD (Gatekeeper-Reflex for Alzheimers Disease), a two-stage A{beta}+ prediction model to improve classification while reserving A{beta}-PET for residual uncertainty. MethodsGRAD was developed in 145 cognitively impaired ADNI participants and externally validated in 1,644 cognitively unimpaired A4/LEARN participants. Stage 1 used p-Tau217 alone; probabilities between 0.25-0.75 were considered indeterminate. Stage 2 used L2-regularized logistic regression combining plasma-biomarkers, genetic and demographic features. A{beta}-PET served as the reference standard (ADNI florbetapir SUVR>1.11; A4 Centiloid[&ge;]20). ResultsFull model AUC was 0.915 (95% CI, 0.859-0.961) internally and 0.879 (95% CI, 0.861-0.895) externally. In the external gray zone (n=630), Stage 2 improved discrimination over p-Tau217 alone (AUC 0.793 vs 0.719; P<.001), increased correct classification without PET from 41.4% to 56.2% and reduced PET referral from 35.9% to 24.3%. In the p-Tau181 subset (n=256), Stage 2 outperformed p-Tau181 (AUC 0.799 vs 0.597; P<.001). Overall, 89.0% of ADNI and 90.7% of A4/LEARN participants were classified without PET; modeled testing costs were 44-52% lower than p-Tau217 screening with PET confirmation of the gray zone. InterpretationReflex multimarker testing improves indeterminate p-Tau217 classification while retaining A{beta}-PET for residual uncertainty. GRAD may reduce PET use and testing costs in memory-clinic triage, prevention-trial enrichment, and disease-modifying therapy workup.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study developed a two-stage plasma biomarker model that classified more participants without amyloid PET and reduced modeled testing costs compared with p-Tau217 screening with PET confirmation of the gray zone. It concerns diagnostic testing strategy, not treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 44/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 41 of the 94 points it could be judged on, which is 44 of 100. Total 44 of 100.41 of the 94 points we could judge = 44 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on impact for its field and year, so that was left out: it earned 41 of the 94 points we could judge it on, which is 44 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Annals of clinical and translational neurology)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology: journal h-index 97 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 630 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: h-index 18 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Harvard University: institution h-index 3,235 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 8 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 41 / 94 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 41 of the 94 points we could judge it on is 44 out of 100.
Total 44 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Parankusham, H., Vanderlip, C., Birkenbihl, C., Krishna, E., Ugboaja, C., Budson, A., et al. (2026). A Two-Stage Plasma Biomarker Algorithm Reduces Amyloid PET Use and the p-Tau217 Gray Zone. Annals of clinical and translational neurology. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.03.26345302

Vancouver

Parankusham H, Vanderlip C, Birkenbihl C, Krishna E, Ugboaja C, Budson A, et al. A Two-Stage Plasma Biomarker Algorithm Reduces Amyloid PET Use and the p-Tau217 Gray Zone. Annals of clinical and translational neurology. 2026. doi:10.64898/2026.02.03.26345302.

BibTeX

@article{parankusham2026-7da4a6e3,
  author  = {Parankusham, H. and Vanderlip, C. and Birkenbihl, C. and Krishna, E. and Ugboaja, C. and Budson, A. and Frank, B.},
  title   = {{A Two-Stage Plasma Biomarker Algorithm Reduces Amyloid PET Use and the p-Tau217 Gray Zone}},
  journal = {Annals of clinical and translational neurology},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.64898/2026.02.03.26345302},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.03.26345302}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 15.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “phosphorylated”

732 studies in the library carry the topic tag “phosphorylated”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 732 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →