Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Tau biomarkers

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Abstract Background: There is high unmet need in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Neflamapimod, showed clinical activity against cognitive and motor endpoints at a dose of 40mg three-times-daily (TID) in a prior phase 2a study in DLB, most prominently in those without Alzheimer disease (AD) co-pathology, assessed by plasma ptau181. Methods: 16-week randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, with a 32-week open label extension, conducted at 43 centers in the US, UK and Netherlands. 159 participants with probable DLB by consensus criteria, screened to enrich for patients without AD co-pathology (plasma ptau181≥27.2 pg/mL excluded), randomized between August 2023 and June 2024 to neflamapimod 40mg (80 participants) or matching placebo (79 participants) capsules, TID.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Taylor, J., Alam, J. J., Gomperts, S. N., Honig, L. S., Prins, N. D., Koubiyr, I., et al. (2026). A Phase 2b randomized clinical trial of the oral p38α inhibitor neflamapimod in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10623740/v1

Vancouver

Taylor J, Alam JJ, Gomperts SN, Honig LS, Prins ND, Koubiyr I, et al. A Phase 2b randomized clinical trial of the oral p38α inhibitor neflamapimod in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Research Square. 2026. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10623740/v1.

BibTeX

@article{taylor2026-9c23dcf2,
  author  = {Taylor, J. and Alam, J. J. and Gomperts, S. N. and Honig, L. S. and Prins, N. D. and Koubiyr, I. and Chu, H. and Gardner, A. and others},
  title   = {{A Phase 2b randomized clinical trial of the oral p38α inhibitor neflamapimod in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)}},
  journal = {Research Square},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-10623740/v1},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10623740/v1}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This 16-week randomized placebo-controlled trial with a 32-week open label extension tested the oral p38α inhibitor neflamapimod in 159 people with probable dementia with Lewy bodies, enriched for those without Alzheimer's disease co-pathology. It concerns dementia with Lewy bodies, not Alzheimer's disease, so it does not show a way to treat, cure, or prevent Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 35 of the 94 points it could be judged on, which is 37 of 100. Raw total 37 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 37 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 37 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design because the record does not state it. We have no data on impact for its field and year, so that was left out: it earned 35 of the 94 points we could judge it on, which is 37 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (Research Square)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 159 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 1 / 2 Randomized (as stated in the record)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author James E. Galvin: h-index 56 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Massachusetts General Hospital: institution h-index 2,057 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 7 institution(s) in 3 countries
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 35 / 94 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 35 of the 94 points we could judge it on is 37 out of 100.
Total 37 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Tau biomarkers

Also tagged “trial”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “trial”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Tau biomarkers

See all studies in Tau biomarkers →