Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Tau biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Abstract Alzheimer disease (AD) is a heterogeneous disease with many genes are associated with AD risk. Most proteomic studies, while instrumental in identifying AD pathways and genes, focus on single tissues and sporadic AD cases. Multi-tissue proteomic signatures for sporadic and genetically defined AD (e.g., pathogenic variant carriers in APP and PSEN1/2 and risk variant carriers in TREM2) will illuminate the biology of this heterogeneous disease.1,2 Here, we present one of the largest multi-tissue proteomic profiles, accessible through our web portal, based on 1,305 proteins in brain (n=360), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF; n=717), and plasma (n=490) from the Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center (Knight ADRC) and Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN) cohorts.3-5 We identified proteomic signatures in brain, CSF, and plasma for sporadic AD status and replicated these findings in

Key findings

Why it matters

This work compared proteins in brain, cerebrospinal fluid, and plasma from people with sporadic and genetically defined Alzheimer's disease, and found a cerebrospinal fluid protein signature that distinguished cases with an area under the curve of 0.89 in the discovery group. It is a biomarker study, so it may help identify disease signatures but does not by itself show a way to treat, cure, or prevent Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 28 of the 94 points it could be judged on, which is 30 of 100. Raw total 30 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 30 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 30 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on impact for its field and year, so that was left out: it earned 28 of the 94 points we could judge it on, which is 30 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (Research Square)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 3 / 5 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 360 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 4 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.6 citations a year over 7 year(s) since 2021
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Oscar Harari: h-index 39 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Harvard University: institution h-index 3,235 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 28 / 94 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 28 of the 94 points we could judge it on is 30 out of 100.
Total 30 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Cruchaga, C., Sung, Y. J., Yang, C., Wang, F., Suhy, A., Norton, J., et al. (2021). Multi-tissue proteomics identifies molecular signatures for sporadic and genetically defined Alzheimer disease cases. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-923492/v1

Vancouver

Cruchaga C, Sung YJ, Yang C, Wang F, Suhy A, Norton J, et al. Multi-tissue proteomics identifies molecular signatures for sporadic and genetically defined Alzheimer disease cases. Research Square. 2021. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-923492/v1.

BibTeX

@article{cruchaga2021-91194d89,
  author  = {Cruchaga, C. and Sung, Y. J. and Yang, C. and Wang, F. and Suhy, A. and Norton, J. and Novotny, B. and Etelleb, A. and others},
  title   = {{Multi-tissue proteomics identifies molecular signatures for sporadic and genetically defined Alzheimer disease cases}},
  journal = {Research Square},
  year    = {2021},
  doi     = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-923492/v1},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-923492/v1}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Tau biomarkers

Also tagged “amyloid-beta”

1,339 studies in the library carry the topic tag “amyloid-beta”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,339 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Tau biomarkers

See all studies in Tau biomarkers →