Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 42 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

This study aimed to test the hypothesis that multi-level factors across the five Health Ecological Model (HEM) layers are independently associated with SCD among hypertensive patients in rural China, and to identify specific associated factors within each layer. Multi-level factors were significantly associated with SCD. In the Individual Characteristics Layer, advanced age (OR = 1.042, 95% CI 1.010 ~ 1.074), family history of hypertension (OR = 2.352, 95% CI 1.550 ~ 3.570), hypertensive complications (OR = 3.049, 95% CI 1.680 ~ 5.534) and moderate hypertension risk level (OR = 1.847, 95% CI 1.149 ~ 2.968) were associated with higher odds of SCD. Within the Behavior and Lifestyle Layer, lack of physical exercise (OR = 1.611, 95% CI 1.075 ~ 2.412) and fairly good and fairly poor sleep quality (fairly good: OR = 1.644, 95% CI 1.063 ~ 2.543; fairly poor: OR = 1.939, 95% CI 1.017 ~ 3.698) were associated with SCD, while former drinker was associated with lower odds of SCD (OR = 0.294, 95% CI 0.107 ~ 0.809), although this association may reflect residual confounding and should not be interpreted causally. In the Working and Living Conditions Layer, lower household income (< 1000 CNY: OR = 3.282, 95% CI 1.647 ~ 6.540), utilization of county-level hospitals (OR = 1.697, 95% CI 1.077 ~ 2.676), and mild depression (OR = 2.068, 95% CI 1.215 ~ 3.519) were associated with SCD. In the Policy Environment Layer, no significant associations were observed. These findings identify multi-level factors associated with SCD in this population, highlighting potential areas for integrated prevention strategies, though longitudinal studies are needed to establish their predictive value.

Key findings

Why it matters

This cross-sectional study identified factors linked to subjective cognitive decline among hypertensive patients in rural China. It does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention for Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 42/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 40 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 42 of 100. Total 42 of 100.40 of the 96 points we could judge = 42 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 40 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 42 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Scientific Reports)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Scientific Reports: journal h-index 463 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Shuhong Zhao holds only 1 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Shanxi Medical University: institution h-index 258 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 42448799)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 40 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 40 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 42 out of 100.
Total 42 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Liang, R., Liu, J., Sun, W., Li, S., Wang, J., Niu, Q., et al. (2026). A health ecological model study of subjective cognitive decline among hypertensive patients in rural Shanxi, China. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-62335-3

Vancouver

Liang R, Liu J, Sun W, Li S, Wang J, Niu Q, et al. A health ecological model study of subjective cognitive decline among hypertensive patients in rural Shanxi, China. Scientific Reports. 2026. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-62335-3. PMID: 42448799.

BibTeX

@article{liang2026-42448799,
  author  = {Liang, Ruifeng and Liu, Jiawei and Sun, Wenhua and Li, Siyi and Wang, Jue and Niu, Qiao and Yu, Hongmei and Qin, Xiaojiang and others},
  title   = {{A health ecological model study of subjective cognitive decline among hypertensive patients in rural Shanxi, China}},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1038/s41598-026-62335-3},
  pmid    = {42448799},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-62335-3}
}

Related studies in Risk factors

Also in Risk factors

356 studies in the library are filed under Risk factors with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Risk factors hub.

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →