29,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant risk factor for chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and Parkinson's disease (PD). 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) refers to any insult to the brain resulting in primary (direct) and secondary (indirect) damage to the brain parenchyma. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Transcriptome study in neurodegenerative disease has advanced considerably in the past 5 years. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Pathological evidence suggests that alterations of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) may occur in association with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) dementia (HIVD). 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia among the elderly, characterized by amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, and neuroinflammation in the brain, as well as impaired cognitive behaviors. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Positron emission tomography (PET) is a well-established imaging modality. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In most neurodegenerative disorders, including multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, and Alzheimer disease, a massive neuronal cell death occurs as a consequence of an uncontrolled inflammatory response, where activated astrocytes and microglia and their cytotoxic agents play a crucial pathological role. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The existing evidence suggests that both could be addressed with either antecedent behavior management strategies, such as creating verbal scripts and routines (e.g., an “escape” routine when he is losing his temper, greeting routines for customers), or consequence-oriented management such as reinforcement of either positive behaviors or low rates of negative behaviors (Ylvisaker, Turkstra, & Coelho, 2005). 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The early literature on Alzheimer Dementia (AD) describes the clinical features aphasia, apraxia and agraphia as characteristic. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Dementia decedents were more likely to die at home and other places and less likely to die at institutional settings over the study period. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Ninety-five percent of the patients with dementia were reported to have at least one agitated behavior; 75% had at least one moderately disruptive behavior. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
After adjusting demographic and clinical covariates, muscle relaxants, long-acting benzodiazepines, and short-acting benzodiazepines were associated with a high risk of fracture injuries, with odds ratios of 1.40 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.72; p < 0.001), 1.9 (95% CI 1.49 to 2.43; p < 0.001), and 1.33 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.55; p < 0.001), respectively. 4 key findings →
Design: case-control study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
For 2018 and 2019, 3.5% and 5.4% received ACP visits, and 0.4% and 0.5% received CAACPS visits, similar to use reported elsewhere. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 2301 patients completed an intake from January 2023 to March 2024. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,301 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
This study aims to analyze the relationship between cognitive function and out-of-pocket cost of the state change of multiple chronic conditions in individuals aged 60 or older. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our findings show a low level of disenrollment. 5 key findings →
Participants: 14,657 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Nearly half of the incident ADRD codes were associated with a hospital‐based encounter. 5 key findings →
Participants: 13,962 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Early-diagnosed patients (N = 421) have a lower utilization rate of inpatient skilled nursing facility, nursing home and hospitalization than late-diagnosed patients (N = 2817) after being diagnosed with AD. 5 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 421 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A growing body of literature has examined the impact of neighborhood characteristics on Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia, yet the spatial variability and relative importance of the most influential factors remain underexplored. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The overall 1-year recurrent stroke rate was 9.4% among 895,916 ischemic stroke patients (mean age: 78 years; 56.6% women; 86.6% White, 9.7% Black and 1.2% Latino/Hispanic). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 321 people with cirrhosis (60 years, 78% men, 75% non-Hispanic White, 24% non-Hispanic African American, 4% Hispanic) were included. 45% had prior HE and 56% MHE. 5 key findings →
Participants: 321 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Stark differences across SES in service use by people with dementia may indicate different health needs and/or allude to pervasive health inequities. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
State case fatality ranged from 3.32% in North Carolina to 9.26% in Connecticut, but for ALs in these states it was 12.89% and 31.59%, respectively. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Global PSP prevalence ranges between 5-6.4 per 100,000, influenced by diagnostic criteria and healthcare infrastructure. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Levels of underdiagnosis varied between 16% for stroke and 69% for prostate cancer in 2018. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 29,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 29,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (63.3% of the library) and OpenAlex (17.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,037 records (3.5% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 964 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →