Home › Research › Health systems and care delivery
Dementia diagnosis patterns in a racially diverse population within an integrated health delivery system
Huong Q. Nguyen, Janet S. Lee, Annette Magdalene Langer-Gould, Soo Borson. Alzheimer s & Dementia, 2021-12-01
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Abstract Background Although nearly 40% of older adults receive care in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, there are limited information on whether the patterns of dementia diagnosis and health care utilization differ from traditional Medicare fee‐for‐service. We examined first ADRD diagnoses by provider type and clinical setting and compared patient socio‐demographic and clinical characteristics across a large integrated health care system in southern California. Methods Patients 65 years and older who were continuously enrolled in the health plan for at least one year prior to January 1, 2015 and had a first dementia diagnosis code during the study period (January 1, 2015‐ December 31, 2018) were included in the analysis. Providers classified as dementia specialists included neurologists, psychiatrists, and geriatricians; all other providers were considered nondementia specialists and mostly represented primary care. Data were derived from electronic health records. Results There were a total of 25,278 incident ADRD codes over the entire study period, slightly more than half assigned in ambulatory care and the remainder during a hospital‐based encounter. For the clinic‐diagnosed cohort (n=13,962), other than a slightly younger age for those diagnosed in neurology/psychiatry compared to geriatrics or primary care (79 vs. 82 years old), there were no other differences, including race/ethnicity or spoken language. Compared to the clinic cohort, the hospital‐diagnosed cohort (n=11,316) was slightly older (83 vs. 81 years old), more likely to be white (59% vs. 53%) and English speaking (90% vs. 85%); had more missed appointments (13% vs. 10%) and were more likely to have a non‐dementia cognitive impairment code in the two years prior (36% vs. 31%). They also had a higher burden of co‐morbidity (8.7 ± 3.8 vs. 7.0 ± 3.4) and higher rate of documented advance directive or POLST (49% vs. 41%) (all, p<.01). Conclusions Nearly half of the incident ADRD codes were associated with a hospital‐based encounter. Patients first diagnosed with ADRD in the hospital setting were generally older and sicker compared to patients diagnosed in the clinic. Given such differing socio‐demographic and clinical characteristics at diagnosis, claims based studies should distinguish patients first diagnosed in hospital vs. clinic‐based settings.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Nguyen, H. Q., Lee, J. S., Langer-Gould, A. M., & Borson, S. (2021). Dementia diagnosis patterns in a racially diverse population within an integrated health delivery system. Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.049875
Vancouver
Nguyen HQ, Lee JS, Langer-Gould AM, Borson S. Dementia diagnosis patterns in a racially diverse population within an integrated health delivery system. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2021. doi:10.1002/alz.049875.
BibTeX
@article{nguyen2021-383db564,
author = {Nguyen, Huong Q. and Lee, Janet S. and Langer-Gould, Annette Magdalene and Borson, Soo},
title = {{Dementia diagnosis patterns in a racially diverse population within an integrated health delivery system}},
journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
year = {2021},
doi = {10.1002/alz.049875},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.049875}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Results There were a total of 25,278 incident ADRD codes over the entire study period, slightly more than half assigned in ambulatory care and the remainder during a hospital‐based encounter.
- For the clinic‐diagnosed cohort (n=13,962), other than a slightly younger age for those diagnosed in neurology/psychiatry compared to geriatrics or primary care (79 vs. 82 years old), there were no other differences, including race/ethnicity or spoken language.
- Compared to the clinic cohort, the hospital‐diagnosed cohort (n=11,316) was slightly older (83 vs. 81 years old), more likely to be white (59% vs. 53%) and English speaking (90% vs. 85%); had more missed appointments (13% vs. 10%) and were more likely to have a non‐dementia cognitive impairment code in the two years prior (36% vs. 31%).
- They also had a higher burden of co‐morbidity (8.7 ± 3.8 vs. 7.0 ± 3.4) and higher rate of documented advance directive or POLST (49% vs. 41%) (all, p<.01).
- Conclusions Nearly half of the incident ADRD codes were associated with a hospital‐based encounter.
Why it matters
In an integrated health system, 25,278 first dementia diagnoses were recorded, slightly more than half in ambulatory care and the rest during hospital encounters, with no racial/ethnic or language differences in the clinic-diagnosed group. This describes where and how diagnoses are made, not how the disease is treated, cured or prevented.
Study details
- Participants13,962
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 42/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia) |
| Journal's citation record | 2 / 4 | Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 4 / 4 | 13,962 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 0 / 7 | Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 0 / 5 | 0.0 citations a year over 7 year(s) since 2021 |
| Impact for its field and year | 0 / 6 | Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 0 / 4 | Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 3 / 4 | Last-listed author Soo Borson: h-index 56 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 3 / 3 | University of Washington: institution h-index 3,540 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 1 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 42 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Related studies in Health systems and care delivery
Also tagged “prevalence”
1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.