People with MCI are at increased risk of developing AD. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 51 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
People with MCI are at increased risk of developing AD. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 51 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Recent expansion of proteomic coverage opens unparalleled avenues to unveil new biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
This study summarizes the existing literature on TSPO expression in specific regions of the brain in patients with dementia, and also provides some preliminary evidence on the possible association between neuroinflammation and dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The mean age was 72 years (49-90 years), and 44 (62%) patients were female. 1 key finding →
Participants: 71 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Early imaging-based detection of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has improved in the era of reperfusion therapy. 1 key finding →
Participants: 193 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Plasma A+/T + individuals showed the highest levels of astrocyte reactivity, Aβ plaque, tau tangle, and axonal degeneration, and the lowest hippocampal volume and temporal-metaROI cortical thickness. 5 key findings →
Participants: 470 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Heritability estimates were 16% for Aβ42/40, 42% for NfL, and 60% for GFAP. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of HTS positivity (HTSpos) were the highest (amyloid PET: 0.930 and 0.870, tau PET: 0.944 and 0.957, respectively), while Cimp and Nimp had a high negative predictive value (NPV) for amyloid PET (negativity) (0.750 and 0.725). 5 key findings →
Participants: 155 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The study population consisted of 194 patients (123 AD and 71 non-AD). 5 key findings →
Participants: 194 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study used measured data from 108 participants and the synthesized data generated from the measured data. 5 key findings →
Participants: 108 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
β-blockers that easily cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) seem to diminish the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD), hypothetically facilitating waste clearance. 3 key findings →
Participants: 216 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Analysis showed strong correlation between (1) XpressO memory tasks scores and the MoCA Memory Index Score (p-values < 0.001), and between (2) XpressO sub-test scores and MoCA total score (p-values < 0.005). 5 key findings →
Participants: 118 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A total of 406 FHS (Framingham Heart Study) and 59 BHS (Bogalusa Heart Study) participants with traditional neuropsychological tests and digital assessments using the Defense Automated Neurocognitive Assessment (DANA) smartphone protocol were included. 5 key findings →
Participants: 406 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The SCST total score, cognitive domain scores (attention, language, visuospatial function, memory, executive function), and most of the subtest scores decreased significantly in the order of SCD, MCI and dementia. 5 key findings →
Participants: 254 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Hypertension is associated with impaired cognition, and when combined with MCI, it may lead to a poor prognosis. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
111 out of 287 participants had hearing impairment. 5 key findings →
Participants: 287 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A total of 717 articles were identified, showing an upward trend in annual publications. 5 key findings →
Participants: 717 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Education partially mediated the effect of adolescent cognition on CI in the cognitive assessment aample and AD8 in the questionnaire sample (Ps < 0.001). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
166 patients were consecutively enrolled (mean age was 85.7 years old, females composed 68%); 25% had a diagnosis of amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and 75% had a diagnosis of dementia. 5 key findings →
Participants: 166 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The predictors of the Social Loneliness factors were as follows; 1) perceived social support (R2 = 0.33): Neuroticism (β= 0.353), depression (β= 0.205), and perceived health (β= 0.133); 2) social participation (R2 = 0.24): Conscientiousness (β= -0.344) and Extraversion (β= -0.263); 3) use of communication technologies (R2 = 0.44): age (β= 0.409), type of cohabitation (β= 0.331), cognitive reserve (β= -0.303), and Conscientiousness (β= -0.247); all p < 0.05. 3 key findings →
Participants: 105 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We found a significant correlation of CSF α-syn level with PM2.5 in urban participants. 4 key findings →
Participants: 933 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Rs-fMRI analysis revealed significant associations between FC and MedDietScore. 5 key findings →
Participants: 105 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A total of 124 participants with Alzheimer disease, cerebrovascular disease, or a mix Alzheimer's and cerebrovascular diseases and 55 controlparticipants underwent magnetic resonance imaging and neuropsychological testing. 5 key findings →
Participants: 124 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Elderly human brains are vulnerable to multiple proteinopathies, although each protein has a different transmission pathway. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Planning for future medical treatment, and care, referred to as advance care planning (ACP), has evolved to a focus on conversations that explore values and preferences in a broad sense. 1 key finding →
Participants: 131 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →