Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Biological Age and Age Acceleration Predict Alzheimer's Disease Plasma Biomarker Levels

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences 2025-08-08

Epigenetic clocks can predict pathological aging associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk, albeit findings are mixed regarding if clocks are predictive in blood and in non-European populations. 4 key findings →

Evidence: moderate

The spectrum of Alzheimer's disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences 2025-11-19

While hippocampal (H) and inferior parietal lobule (IPL) atrophy are used routinely in Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnostics, the role of enlarged choroid plexus (ChP) remains unclear. 2 key findings →

Participants: 872 Evidence: moderate

Identifying and Predicting Cognitive Decline Using Multi-Modal Sensor Data and Machine Learning Approach

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research square 2025-06-18

Our results demonstrate that the multi-modal classifier achieved strong classification performance (accuracy = 68.64%; precision = 73.97%; F1-score=74.48%), with the highest recall (76.39%) from a model incorporating demographics and driving features, and prediction performance (accuracy = 70.48%; precision = 71.88%; F1-score = 74.80%, recall = 77.97%). 1 key finding →

Participants: 118 Evidence: low

The lipids and proteins that comprise lipid droplets regulate several cellular functions including lipid storage, stress responses, and inflammation. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

To better characterize the genetic architecture underlying Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementia (ADRD), we performed a meta-analysis of European ancestry genome-wide association studies in 128,681 cases or proxy cases of ADRD and 849,833 (proxy) controls. 3 key findings →

Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high

Genetic drivers of progression in Alzheimer's disease are distinct from disease risk

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences 2025-11-19

Established AD risk factors, including APOE ε4 dosage and polygenic risk scores, were not associated with disease progression amyloid positive individuals who are actively declining. 5 key findings →

Design: meta-analysis Participants: 222 Evidence: high

Trem2R47H and reduced TREM2 expression both mimic human Alzheimer's disease signatures in mice

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology 2025-12-19

Trem2*R47H mice had alternative splicing leading to reduced Trem2 expression; Trem2*R47HHSS mice expressed Trem2 at wild-type transcript and protein levels. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Spatial Multi-Omics Workflow and Analytical Guidelines for Alzheimer's Neuropathology

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology 2025-11-17

Spatial biology technologies enable high-dimensional profiling within intact tissues, revealing how molecular and cellular organization drives function and disease. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Brain Region-Specific Epigenomic Reorganization and Altered Cell States in Alzheimer's Disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology 2025-09-30

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder, yet the molecular mechanisms underlying its region- and cell-type-specific pathogenesis remain poorly defined. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

PCSK9 and High-Fat Diet Synergistically Induce Neurovascular Dysfunction and Neuroinflammation

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology 2025-10-31

Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is strongly linked to metabolic risk factors and represents a major cause of vascular cognitive impairment and dementia. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Human Wild-Type α-Synuclein Drives Progressive Tau Pathology in a Disease-Relevant Mouse Model of Synucleinopathy

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research square 2025-12-03

Tau pathology, characterized by the aberrant aggregation and accumulation of tau in neurons and glial cells, plays a critical role in the onset and progression of multiple neurodegenerative diseases. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Investigating the Amyloid-Tau-Neurodegeneration Framework in Alzheimer’s Disease Using Semi-Supervised Multimodal Imaging Data Fusion

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2025-12-15

Semi-supervised multimodal fusion improves prediction and reveals interpretable imaging patterns that predict APOE4 and clinical diagnoses better than traditional approaches. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Night-to-night REM sleep variability: a relevant marker of early amyloid-β deposition

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2025-12-27

Shorter sleep duration and greater REM sleep variability may index early AD-related brain changes, warranting longitudinal studies to establish their prognostic significance. 2 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: high

MRI measures of cortical microstructural damage associate with tau accumulation in presymptomatic Alzheimer’s disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2025-12-16

NODDI-derived ODI is associated with tau PET signal, even in preclinical disease and may discriminate individuals with-and without tau beyond the MTL. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Budget Impact Analysis of Disease-Modifying Therapies for Alzheimer’s Disease in Ireland: A Model-Based Analysis

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2025-12-30

These therapies require complex diagnostic workup and safety monitoring, raising significant budget impact concerns for healthcare payers. 2 key findings →

Participants: 11,568 Evidence: low

A Biophysical Framework for Neurodegeneration: Prioritizing Protein Homeostasis Over Aggregate Toxicity

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Preprints.org 2025-12-31

Neurodegenerative research has long hypothesized that aggregated proteins such as amyloid‑β (Aβ), tau, and α‑synuclein (αSyn) are intrinsically toxic and are directly associated with the etiologies of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

ScFv-h3D6 Prevents Bapineuzumab-Induced Hemorrhagic Events in the APP23 Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Preprints.org 2025-11-05

The occurrence of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), found in clinical trials for Aβ-immunotherapy, has been related to the antibody’s effector function on glial activation by the Fc portion of the antibody. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Real-world experience with lecanemab therapy for Alzheimer’s disease in the Intermountain West

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2025-10-02

Our study examined the safety and tolerability of centralized lecanemab administration across a widely distributed region and suggests that use of distributed infusion sites increases access to disease-modifying treatment without significant increase in risk. 2 key findings →

Participants: 70 Evidence: low

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed