Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Drug development

Topic: Disease mechanisms in lab and animal studies

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2/B1 (hnRNPA2/B1) is an RNA-binding protein that mislocalizes to the cytoplasm and forms stress-induced granules in tauopathy and multisystem proteinopathy. It also preferentially interacts with oligomeric tau and is required for tau-mediated neurodegeneration in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. To study endogenous hnRNPA2/B1 and tau, we generated nanobodies that specifically recognize these proteins. We screened yeast surface display nanobody libraries using an avidity-enhanced screening strategy that enabled selection of binders against short peptide ligands. This led to isolation of anti-hnRNPA2/B1 and anti-tau nanobodies with defined epitopes. Directed evolution of the anti-hnRNPA2/B1 nanobody improved binding affinity by over 20-fold but caused cytoplasmic aggregation, demonstrating a tradeoff between affinity and intracellular behavior. Although the final nanobodies retained modest affinities, they showed robust intracellular colocalization with their targets. Furthermore, fusion to ubiquitin ligase adaptor domains significantly decreased hnRNPA2/B1 and tau levels. Collectively, these nanobodies provide valuable tools for studying hnRNPA2/B1 and tau dynamics in their native cellular context.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 13 of the 60 points it could be judged on, which is 22 of 100. Raw total 22 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 22 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 22 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 13 of the 60 points we could judge it on, which is 22 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41383776)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 13 / 60 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 13 of the 60 points we could judge it on is 22 out of 100.
Total 22 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Pirhanov, A., Rodriguez, C., Tashakori-Asfestani, F., Gonsoulin, R., Santiago, R., Tobunluepop, K., et al. (2025). Nanobodies targeting hnRNPA2/B1 and tau. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.21.689763

Vancouver

Pirhanov A, Rodriguez C, Tashakori-Asfestani F, Gonsoulin R, Santiago R, Tobunluepop K, et al. Nanobodies targeting hnRNPA2/B1 and tau. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology. 2025. doi:10.1101/2025.11.21.689763. PMID: 41383776.

BibTeX

@article{pirhanov2025-41383776,
  author  = {Pirhanov, Azady and Rodriguez, Cristian and Tashakori-Asfestani, Fatemeh and Gonsoulin, Raven and Santiago, Rayne and Tobunluepop, Katarnut and Erhunmwunsee, Emmanuella and Puri, Sambhavi and others},
  title   = {{Nanobodies targeting hnRNPA2/B1 and tau}},
  journal = {bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1101/2025.11.21.689763},
  pmid    = {41383776},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.21.689763}
}

Related studies in Drug development

Also tagged “phosphorylation”

387 studies in the library carry the topic tag “phosphorylation”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 387 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Drug development

See all studies in Drug development →