However, many did not adjust for important confounders or did not include women and non-whites. 4 key findings →
Participants: 10,975 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
31,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
However, many did not adjust for important confounders or did not include women and non-whites. 4 key findings →
Participants: 10,975 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The interplay between midlife vascular risk factors and midlife cognitive function with later life mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia (DEM) is not well understood. 4 key findings →
Participants: 5,995 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We tested the hypotheses that higher levels of and persistence of midlife leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) are associated long-term with lower cognitive decline and less incident dementia. 4 key findings →
Participants: 10,705 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We examined factors associated with self-reported medication nonadherence in well-characterized community-based cohort of older adults. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 5,164 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 5,129 participants were included in the study (59% female; 22% identified as Black; mean (standard deviation) age at visit 5 of 75 (5) years). 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,026 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Compared to good olfaction, moderate olfaction (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26 to 1.86), hyposmia (HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.81 to 2.78), and anosmia (HR: 3.47, 95% CI: 2.77 to 4.34) were all associated with higher dementia hazard; these associations were consistent across age, race, sex, and APOE ε4 groups. 5 key findings →
Participants: 4,470 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Higher arterial stiffness and pulsatility were associated with MCI and dementia in white participants. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
CMBs are a common vascular pathology in the elderly. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Hypertensive pregnancy disorders are associated with worse performance on tests of processing speed and smaller brain volumes decades later. 4 key findings →
Participants: 1,279 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Clinical studies have shown alterations in metabolic profiles when patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease dementia were compared to cognitively normal subjects. 4 key findings →
Participants: 1,534 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
MCI and dementia were common among survivors from the original ARIC cohort. 1 key finding →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
MCI and dementia were common among survivors from the original ARIC cohort.
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A growing body of literature has suggested that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and habitual short sleep duration are linked to poor cognitive function. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cerebral atrophy, detected as ventricular enlargement or sulcal widening on MRI, is recognized as a risk factor for vascular dementia or Alzheimer disease. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer disease (AD) involves glial inflammation associated with amyloid plaques. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Accurate assessment of cognitive impairment requires comparison of cognitive performance in individuals to performance in a comparable healthy normative population. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plasma biomarkers such as phospho-tau species are increasingly used in clinical practice for the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Genetic variants increase the risk of neurocognitive disorders in later life, including vascular dementia (VaD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but the precise relationships between genetic risk factors and underlying disease etiologies are not well understood. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Higher serum GFAP, YKL-40, sCD14, and NfL were associat 4 key findings →
Participants: 3,082 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The incidence of dementia, and specifically, Alzheimer's disease, is higher in women than men, even in middle age, making it possible to rule out lifespan differences between men and women as a contributing factor. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 31,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 31,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.2%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,048 records (3.3% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 973 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events