31,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Second, we examined volumetric associations with amyloid (amyloid positive, tau negative versus control) and tau in the presence of amyloid (amyloid positive, tau positive versus amyloid positive, tau negative) across 52 brain areas. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 306 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Age, sex, and apolipoprotein E (APOE) are the strongest risk factors for late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 4,592 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The trajectories of core Alzheimer disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers and the concurrent cognitive changes across the clinical spectrum remain unclear yet are important for clinical trial design. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 197 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia-related blood biomarkers are the future of large-scale dementia risk stratification; however, the extent to which phosphorylated tau (P-tau181), neurofilament light (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are associated with nonmodifiable risk factors has yet to be confirmed in the community, and the role of menopause has yet to be investigated. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 9,940 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The aim of this study was to evaluate longitudinal associations of multimodal core 1 AD biomarkers with cognition in a cognitively unimpaired (CU) population at increased risk of AD dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 350 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
α-Synuclein seed amplification assays (αSAAs) can improve the diagnosis of synucleinopathies and detect α-synuclein (αSyn) copathology in vivo in clinical practice. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 337 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
However, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis did not support differences in orexin-A between AD and controls. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) may be an early indicator of Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD), yet its association with plasma biomarkers remains unclear among middle-aged and older adults (aged 50-86 years). 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 5,712 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Depression is a known risk factor for dementia and MCI, but its associations with AT(N) biomarkers remain inconsistent and may differ by cognitive status. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 2,929 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Functional impairment (FI) is a key criterion for diagnosing dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,000 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
α-Synuclein (αSyn) seed amplification assays (SAAs) accurately detect αSyn pathology in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We investigated whether specific SLEs are associated with AD pathology and neurodegeneration and how these associations differ by gender and education. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In vitro and animal studies have suggested that inoculation with herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) can lead to amyloid deposits, hyperphosphorylation of tau, and/or neuronal loss. 4 key findings →
Participants: 58 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is driven by vascular Aβ (amyloid-beta) deposition, which can be detected as reduced Aβ species in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 31 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Diet can impact cognitive aging, but comprehensive data from human studies is lacking and the underlying biological mechanisms are still not fully understood. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,907 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Early identification of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology is essential for timely intervention, particularly in primary care. 4 key findings →
Participants: 181 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
It is largely unknown how alcohol use affects the risk of Alzheimer`s disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 301 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of the 250 participants, 121 (48.4%) were female and the mean age at follow-up was 76.06 (SD 0.48). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 250 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plasma biomarkers may aid Alzheimer disease (AD) diagnosis and prognosis. 4 key findings →
Participants: 301 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The study included 57 patients (54% female, mean age 67 years), of whom 41 met AD diagnostic criteria. 5 key findings →
Participants: 57 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The defining pathological features of Alzheimer disease (AD) may also be contributing factors in other dementias. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Intrinsic capacity (IC) is a recent key concept proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) based on aspects of functional ability (both physical and mental) rather than the presence or absence of diseases, with a potential to predict several health outcomes. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 491 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Subgroups with slower versus faster neurodegeneration, despite similar pathological accumulation, were compared to assess associations with genetic/lifestyles. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 529 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a small vessel disease characterized by the deposition of amyloid-beta in small cerebral vessels, which can lead to intracerebral hemorrhages and cognitive impairment. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
BackgroundAs the prevalence of Alzheimer disease (AD) rises, early identification of at-risk individuals is essential for effective intervention. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 31,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 31,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.2%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,048 records (3.3% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 973 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events