27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Between May 18, 2021, and Sept 8, 2023, 9981 participants were screened, of whom 3808 were randomly assigned; 1855 in evoke (semaglutide, n=928; placebo, n=927) and 1953 in evoke+ (semaglutide, n=976; placebo, n=977). 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 928 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The slow progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) poses a challenge for the quantification of early disease-driven cognitive decline. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 152 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Adherence was high (82.2%) and usability favorable. 4 key findings →
Participants: 1,815 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Plasma phosphorylated tau217 has been suggested as a core biomarker for establishing a biological Alzheimer's disease diagnosis. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 691 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Carriers had lower LAS-FNAME performance (P < 0.001) and higher p-tau217 (P < 0.001), NfL (P = 0.013), and GFAP (P < 0.001) levels than non-carriers. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Agreement for the global CDR was moderate (κ = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.47-0.59). 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,140 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study provides the first molecular characterization of MAPT gene variants in Indonesian patients with vascular dementia. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 17 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A total of 1,345 individuals were included. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,345 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In response to correspondence from Cognivue, Inc. regarding our publication (Jannati et al., 2025), we clarify that our analysis employed a rigorous paired-sample design using the same 930 participants from the Bio-Hermes-001 study for both the Digital Clock and Recall® (DCR) and Cognivue Clarity® assessments. 3 key findings →
Participants: 930 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In MCI and dementia, the HTS is an ecologically valid non-canonical sign, frequently occurs in daily life too, associated with longer disease duration and spatial disorientation. 2 key findings →
Design: retrospective cohort Participants: 71 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Routine liver–metabolic indices were associated with cognitive performance, while FIB-4 stage showed effect modification by APOE ε4 in relation to both cognition and amyloid PET SUVR. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 507 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In the ADMET2 biomarker subset (n = 44, MPH:21, age:75 years, MMSE:20.2), higher baseline TNF was associated with higher M6 NPI-A [B(SE)= 6.86 (1.71), p = .0003], and multivariable models found lower baseline TNF [B(SE)= 8.28(1.61), p < .001] and higher baseline S100B [B(SE)= -6.41(1.95), p = .002] were associated with lower M6 NPI-A. Exploratory analyses suggested that higher baseline NfL significantly interacted with treatment to predict lower M6 NPI-A [B(SE)= -8.36(4.21), p = .05], only when adjusting for cognition. 5 key findings →
Participants: 44 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
After adjusting for potential confounders, multivariable logistic regression models revealed that the prevalence of dementia was significantly higher in individuals with chronic pain than in those without. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,096 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In this retrospective, confounder-adjusted study, anticoagulation was associated with slower cognitive/functional decline and lower hospitalization/mortality risk in AF and dementia patients. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 291 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A significant median Centiloid reduction of 30.9 was observed, with a 24.1% amyloid PET negativity rate after six months. 3 key findings →
Participants: 42 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Average adherence was 41%. Despite this, remote measures demonstrated excellent reliability (ICCs > 0.90 after 10 sessions) and strong construct validity, with tasks loading onto memory, attention, and executive function domains. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Epidemiological studies consistently indicate a two- to threefold increased risk of dementia among individuals with schizophrenia, although estimates vary due to diagnostic and ascertainment biases. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 219 completing participants (mean age 73.5 years), the mean SUS score was 82.0 (95% CI: 80.3-83.8), with 84% exceeding the usability threshold (SUS score > 68). 5 key findings →
Participants: 241 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The mean DDAF score was 40.56 ± 21.18 among digital natives (18-29 years), 34.93 ± 21.88 among the digital transition generation (30-44 years), and 25.17 ± 18.59 among digital immigrants (45-70 years) (p < 0.001). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
• Lower MMSE scores—even by a single point—were independently associated with a significantly higher risk of developing ADRD. • Individuals with MMSE scores between 27 and 30 should not be viewed as a uniform group. • Further studies are needed to find ways to prevent ADRD in people who are at risk but do not yet show symptoms. 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,228 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The Benson Complex Figure Test (BCFT) is a neuropsychological tool designed to assess visuospatial construction and visual memory with lower complexity than traditional tests. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,428 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
BackgroundThe yes-no reversal (YNR) phenomenon consists in a patient saying "yes" when meaning "no", or vice-versa. 3 key findings →
Participants: 267 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The machine learning model predicted MMSE scores with a root-mean-squared error (RMSE) of 2.43 in the BH test set. 4 key findings →
Participants: 945 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The MMSE–CDR‐SB residual may help flag less AD‐typical presentations for further etiologic evaluation, but cannot be interpreted as a pathology‐specific marker due to substantial overlap across diagnostic groups. 2 key findings →
Participants: 1,981 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Eighteen studies identified four core components of multidomain interventions: physical exercise, cognitive training, nutrition, and cardiovascular risk management. 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →