Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 44 out of 100. Cognitive tests and assessment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

BackgroundThe yes-no reversal (YNR) phenomenon consists in a patient saying "yes" when meaning "no", or vice-versa.ObjectiveTo investigate the prevalence of the YNR phenomenon in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia across different neurodegenerative, chronic cerebrovascular, or mixed etiologies, and to explore its demographic and clinical correlates.MethodsInformants of N = 267 patients with MCI or dementia due to possible/probable Alzheimer's disease (AD; N = 164), frontotemporal lobar degeneration (N = 25), Lewy body disease (N = 18), mixed-i.e., AD and chronic cerebrovascular-etiologies (N = 37), Aβ-negative degenerative etiologies (N = 6), and chronic cerebrovascular disease (N = 17) were inquired on the occurrence of YNRs in everyday-life conversations. YNR+ and YNR- patients were compared on demographics (i.e., age, sex, education), disease duration (in months), disease severity (i.e., MCI versus dementia), etiology and total and subscale-/item-level Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. A multiple logistic model was also run on the presence/absence of YNRs by addressing, as predictors, variables that yielded significance at an univariable level.ResultsThe YNR phenomenon was recorded in 23 patients (8.61%), all of them being demented (i.e., no MCI patient showed YNRs). YNR+ patients were younger and scored lower on Immediate recall and Language subscores of the MMSE. The prevalence of YNRs was higher in non-AD- (∼18%) versus AD-related (∼5%) etiologies. The effects of disease severity and etiology were confirmed by the multiple logistic model, while the others were not.ConclusionsThe YNR phenomenon is a clinical sign possibly associated with dementia due to non-AD etiologies.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Aiello, E. N., De Luca, G., Moreschi, A., Curti, B., Cazzini, F., Cerri, A., et al. (2026). The yes-no reversal phenomenon: Prevalence and correlates in mild cognitive impairment and dementia due to neurodegenerative, chronic cerebrovascular, and mixed etiologies. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261418686

Vancouver

Aiello EN, De Luca G, Moreschi A, Curti B, Cazzini F, Cerri A, et al. The yes-no reversal phenomenon: Prevalence and correlates in mild cognitive impairment and dementia due to neurodegenerative, chronic cerebrovascular, and mixed etiologies. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 2026. doi:10.1177/13872877261418686. PMID: 41660964.

BibTeX

@article{aiello2026-41660964,
  author  = {Aiello, Edoardo Nicolò and De Luca, Giulia and Moreschi, Arianna and Curti, Beatrice and Cazzini, Francesco and Cerri, Andrea and Saba, Selene and Patisso, Valerio and others},
  title   = {{The yes-no reversal phenomenon: Prevalence and correlates in mild cognitive impairment and dementia due to neurodegenerative, chronic cerebrovascular, and mixed etiologies}},
  journal = {Journal of Alzheimer s Disease},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1177/13872877261418686},
  pmid    = {41660964},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261418686}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that the yes-no reversal phenomenon occurred in about 8.6% of patients, all of whom had dementia rather than mild cognitive impairment, and was more common in non-Alzheimer's etiologies. It describes a clinical sign and does not test any treatment.

Study details

How this study scored 44/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 44 of 100.44 of 100 points earned56 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Alzheimer s Disease)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Journal of Alzheimer s Disease: journal h-index 218 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 267 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 4.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Federico Verde: h-index 26 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Padua: institution h-index 1,158 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41660964)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 44 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Cognitive tests and assessment

Also tagged “mini-mental”

840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “mini-mental”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Cognitive tests and assessment

See all studies in Cognitive tests and assessment →