This meta-analysis provides evidence that CCT improves cognitive function in older people with MCI. 2 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 690 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
This meta-analysis provides evidence that CCT improves cognitive function in older people with MCI. 2 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 690 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Polysomnography (PSG) studies of sleep changes in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have reported but not fully established the relationship between sleep disturbances and AD. 2 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Worldwide, the prevalence of dementia is increasing and diet as a modifiable factor could play a role. 3 key findings →
Participants: 493,888 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Growing evidence suggests that fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) likely increases the risks of dementia, yet little is known about the relative contributions of different constituents. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Comparisons of ADNC in typical amnestic versus atypical aphasic dementia and of TDP in type A versus type C revealed fundamental biological and clinical differences, suggesting that members of each pair may constitute distinct clinicopathologic entities despite identical downstream proteinopathies. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 68 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our findings elucidate the predictive values of environmental factors and comorbid conditions in identifying RBD patients at higher risk of phenoconversion. 4 key findings →
Participants: 319 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Whether or not there is targeted pharmacotherapy for dementia, an active and healthy lifestyle that includes physical activity (PA) may be a better option than medication for preventing dementia. 4 key findings →
Participants: 484,169 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
It has been well established that the TMEM106B gene rs1990622 variant was a frontotemporal dementia (FTD) risk factor. 4 key findings →
Participants: 314,278 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of progressive and irreversible dementia, and accurate diagnosis of AD at its prodromal stage is clinically important. 4 key findings →
Participants: 422 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Visinin-like protein-1 (VILIP-1) and chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1 or YKL-40) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are newly discovered markers indicating neuronal damage and microglial activation, respectively. 4 key findings →
Participants: 121 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology starts long before clinical symptoms manifest, and there is no therapy to treat, delay, or prevent the disease. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
There is accumulating evidence that synaptic loss precedes neuronal loss and correlates best with impaired memory formation in Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Participants: 52 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Positron emission tomography (PET) with 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) reveals altered cerebral metabolism in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's dementia (AD). 4 key findings →
Participants: 332 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Acupuncture has been used in the therapy of Alzheimer disease (AD); however, its neural mechanisms are still unclear. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) is an immune receptor that affects cellular phenotypes by modulating phagocytosis and metabolism, promoting cell survival, and counteracting inflammation. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Defective brain hormonal signaling has been associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD), a disorder characterized by synapse and memory failure. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer's disease is a common and devastating disease characterized by aggregation of the amyloid-β peptide. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has been improving patient outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its effectiveness is highly subjective to individual tumor microenvironment. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study will provide evidences to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SMYZD in combination with GBEs in treatment of VaD, as well as the adjuvant role of SMYZD in combination. 5 key findings →
Participants: 196 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) serves as an anti-inflammatory receptor, negatively regulating the innate immune response. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Observational studies strongly supported the association of low levels of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and cognitive impairment or dementia in aging populations. 4 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Extensive studies indicate that β-amyloid (Aβ) aggregation is pivotal for Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression; however, cumulative evidence suggests that Aβ itself is not sufficient to trigger AD-associated degeneration, and whether other additional pathological factors drive AD pathogenesis remains unclear. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Oxidative stress is a component of many diseases, including atherosclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer disease and cancer. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Combining multi-modality data for brain disease diagnosis such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) commonly leads to improved performance than those using a single modality. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Triggering receptor expressed in myeloid cells (TREM)2 is a genetic high-risk factor for sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is considered a potential target for AD diagnosis and therapy, although its role in the different stages of AD remains controversial. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →