28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
This review should serve as a compendium of updated information on VaD and provide guidance in terms of newer diagnostic and potential therapeutic approaches. 2 key findings →
Design: narrative review Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A thematic analysis revealed factors that motivate household members to use these technologies. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A growing body of research has shown that people with dementia are using digital technologies to enhance lived experience. 1 key finding →
Participants: 19 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The model accurately identified dementia subtypes using measures readily available in underrepresented settings, with a similar performance than advanced biomarkers. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The prevalence of a number of clinical features occurring in patients with early- (before age 65) and late-onset primary degenerative dementia of the Alzheimer type (PDDAT) are compared. 3 key findings →
Participants: 65 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Process evaluations confirmed satisfaction and high completion rates of the program. 5 key findings →
Participants: 150 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The newly diagnosed ADRD and new AChEI users cohorts included 861,727 and 395,319 patients, respectively. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 861,727 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Of the 508 eligible MA enrollees, mean age was 82.8 (SD = 7.2) years, 81% were female, and 49% were non-Latino White; 62 participants (12%) were classified as having dementia by the cohort assessment. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 62 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The reanalyzed study population (aged 70 year and above) was composed of Central and North-Eastern Spanish sub-populations obtained from 9 surveys and totaled 12,232 persons and 1,194 cases of dementia (707 of Alzheimer's disease, 238 of vascular dementia). 5 key findings →
Participants: 12,232 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Crude new ADRD diagnosis rate ranged from 1.7 to 5.4 per 100 across HRRs. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The relationship between hearing impairment and dementia has attracted significant attention, the 2024 Lancet Commission report identifying hearing loss as the largest modifiable risk factor for dementia from mid-life. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Linear mixed modelling of time effects found progression of all CBI-R domains, aside from sleep, beliefs and mood domains, and all ACE-III domains. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Also, there are no licensed treatments specifically for VD.[3] What sets VD apart from other dementias are the following factors: The etiology of VD is clearly associated with brain tissue loss and dysfunction secondary to vascular pathophysiology in which hypertension seems to be the main reason.[4] While the exact cellular mechanisms are still not clear, it does imply that VD may potentially be largely preventable through better cardiovascular-metabolic risk modification. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Between 1992-2021, global AD cases increased from 4.078 million to 9.837 million, while the global age-standardised incidence rate (ASIR) remained relatively stable, rising slightly from 117.7 to 119.8 per 100 000. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
While educational disparities in dementia incidence are well-known, whether and to what extent they persist beyond dementia onset is less explored. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The study cohort included 17,398 AI/AN adults aged ≥ 65 years who were dementia-free at baseline, of whom 59.8% were female. 5 key findings →
Participants: 17,398 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Measures of cognition were especially important predictive features of clinical diagnosis. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The ten top-funded companies offering DDLS received a total funding of EUR 128.52 million, of which three companies collected more than 75%. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Dementia (VCID), the second most common form of dementia, is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study analyzed 871 patients with cognitive impairment, 69.8% of whom were having functional impairment. 5 key findings →
Participants: 871 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Herpes Zoster (HZ), caused by the reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus (VZV), is a common infectious disease. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia is a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. 2 key findings →
Participants: 15 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD) are becoming increasingly prevalent and are predicted to affect up to 153 million globally by 2050. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia is introduced.
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This paper proposes a new approach to automatically detect dementia. 2 key findings →
Participants: 29 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
10 of the 1,234 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →