Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. How common it is

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background Rates of dementia may vary among ethnoracial groups. Any real and substantial such difference would merit serious attention by health planners, clinicians and those seeking to advance our understanding of the etiology of this group of disorders. Methods Randomly selected elderly persons from each of three ethnoracial groups (Latinos, African-Americans, non-Latino Whites) residing in a geographic area of northern Manhattan in New York City were screened for dementia and assessed with respect to functioning in daily tasks and other qualities of life. Systematic samples of each group were clinically evaluated for presence and subtype of dementia. Subjects were reassessed at an average of 18 months following the baseline interview. Results Age-specific prevalence of dementia was found to be higher in Latinos and African-Americans than in non-Latino Whites; incidence rates were consistent with this finding. Ethnoracial groups did not vary in the proportion of dementias diagnosed as Alzheimer's disease. Prevalence differences between ethnoracial groups remained consistent as diagnostic criteria were varied in breadth and when the possible mislabelling of depression was taken into account. However, level of education was strongly associated with rates of dementia and, when age and education were simultaneously controlled, the ethnoracial differences in rates were not consistently found. Conclusions Planning for the wide range of services necessary for care of those suffering from dementia should take into account ethnoracial differences in rates. The higher rates found in Latino and African-American groups, relative to non-Latino Whites, are associated with clear and substantial functional dependencies and hence have important implications for qualities of life and service needs.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Gurland, B. J., Wilder, D. E., Lantigua, R., Stern, Y., Chen, J., Killeffer, E. H., et al. (1999). Rates of dementia in three ethnoracial groups. International journal of geriatric psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199906)14:6<481::aid-gps959>3.0.co;2-5

Vancouver

Gurland BJ, Wilder DE, Lantigua R, Stern Y, Chen J, Killeffer EH, et al. Rates of dementia in three ethnoracial groups. International journal of geriatric psychiatry. 1999. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199906)14:6<481::aid-gps959>3.0.co;2-5. PMID: 10398359.

BibTeX

@article{gurland1999-10398359,
  author  = {Gurland, B. J. and Wilder, D. E. and Lantigua, R. and Stern, Y. and Chen, J. and Killeffer, E. H. and Mayeux, R.},
  title   = {{Rates of dementia in three ethnoracial groups}},
  journal = {International journal of geriatric psychiatry},
  year    = {1999},
  doi     = {10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199906)14:6<481::aid-gps959>3.0.co;2-5},
  pmid    = {10398359},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199906)14:6<481::aid-gps959>3.0.co;2-5}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In a random sample of older Latino, African-American and non-Latino White residents of northern Manhattan, dementia was more common, and new cases arose more often, among Latinos and African-Americans; the groups had the same share of dementia diagnosed as Alzheimer's disease, and the gap held when diagnostic criteria or possible depression mislabelling were varied. Education was strongly linked to dementia, and once age and education were accounted for together the ethnic differences were not consistently found, so this observational study does not show that ethnicity itself causes dementia. The authors note the higher rates came with substantial dependence in daily tasks and argue dementia care services should be planned with these differences in mind.

Study details

How this study scored 49/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 4 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 49 of 100.49 of 100 points earned51 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (International journal of geriatric psychiatry)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: journal h-index 190 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1999 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 419 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 14.4 citations a year over 29 year(s) since 1999
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 4.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 4 / 6 Cited by 49 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 55 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Richard P Mayeux: h-index 158 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Columbia University: institution h-index 1,824 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 10398359)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 49 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

49 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in How common it is

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,223 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,223 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on How common it is

See all studies in How common it is →