27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
In the whole sample, significant differences between ethnicities were found in demographic, SE, psychological, and health variables. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,833 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Non-White race and adverse social and socioeconomic factors-lower education, unemployment, unmarried status, and greater neighborhood disadvantage-were each associated with poorer cognitive performance (p < 0.05). 4 key findings →
Participants: 274 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Frailty increasingly is recognized as a factor that modifies the relationship between disease biomarkers, including neuropathology, and dementia expression. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Greater TSPO is associated with lower performance in episodic memory, attention/processing speed, executive function, language, and visuospatial ability in amyloid-positive individuals, but restricted to episodic memory in amyloid-negative individuals. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 21 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Older age, White race, APOE ε4 carrier, and diabetes were associated with biomarker levels indicative of higher AD risk (lower Aβ42/40; higher p-tau217, p-tau217/Aβ42, NfL, and GFAP). 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,356 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 871 participants (mean age: 62.80 ± 6.02 years), every SD increase in AIx and RI scores was both associated with 0.010 pg/mL (95% CI: 0.003–0.017, p = 0.004) higher blood p-tau217 levels after adjustment for age, employment status, BMI, mild cognitive impairment, hypertension, cholesterol-HDL ratio, renal function, and ApoE4 carrier status. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 871 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This joint Position Paper, developed by the Italian Expert Panel on Alzheimer convened by the Italian Society of Neurology with participation from multiple scientific societies, outlines strategic guidelines for reorganizing the patient journey in the era of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies for Alzheimer's disease. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The spreading of MAPT/Tau pathology is closely associated with the progression of neurodegeneration and cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease and other tauopathies. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
AD risk was associated with shorter TL (β = -0.48, P < 2 × 10–16). 5 key findings →
Participants: 6,973 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of the 75 LOAD associated loci, 52 had at least one variant in the top1% of |nSL| in two populations from the 1000 Genomes data. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,504 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Higher total meat consumption (red meat: 51%, poultry: 20%, processed meat: 29%), was associated with a better cognitive trajectory only in the APOE34/44 stratum (β per 1 z-unit increase: 0.011; CI: 0.004 to 0.018 versus -0.003; CI: -0.008 to 0.003; P for interaction = 0.002). 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Over 15 years of follow-up (UKB), moderate or high CVH versus low CVH was associated with a lower risk of MCI (hazard ratio 0.82 [95% CI 0.71, 0.95], P < 0.05) but not with risk of all-cause dementia (0.97 [0.84, 1.11], P = 0.63). 4 key findings →
Participants: 41,374 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia, with an estimated 6.9 million Americans aged 65 and older living with Alzheimer dementia today, with this number projected to grow to 13.8 million by 2060. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This cross-sectional study examines the quality of information on Alzheimer disease (AD) monoclonal antibodies presented by news websites. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The advent of anti-amyloid therapies (AATs) for Alzheimer disease (AD) has elevated the importance of MRI surveillance for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) such as microhemorrhages and siderosis (ARIA-H) and edema (ARIA-E). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Due to the reduced variability in endpoints when using digital twins as covariates in statistical analyses, the TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 trial could have enrolled up to 24% fewer control arm participants to draw the same conclusions about treatment efficacy as previously reported for the study's primary outcome, the integrated Alzheimer Disease Rating Scale (iADRS) at 18 months. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Reasonable nutrient intake encompassing macronutrients and micronutrients have an independent protective relationship with NAFLD. 5 key findings →
Design: narrative review Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The findings indicate that the deficiencies within these institutions are not merely technical but are significantly influenced by systemic disparities in power, resource allocation, and political stability. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Endometriosis is a chronic, oestrogen-dependent inflammatory condition affecting approximately 10% of women of reproductive age, frequently associated with chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea and infertility, substantially impairing quality of life. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Hearing loss in midlife is an important and potentially modifiable risk factor for the development of dementia. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with a growing global burden. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Patients with MASLD are at increased risk for the occurrence of cardiovascular events. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 3777 studies were identified, and 106 studies met the inclusion criteria. 5 key findings →
Participants: 3,777 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia and depression are two prevalent disorders that warrant significant attention due to their high prevalence and substantial contribution to the global burden of disease. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) is a rare life-threatening condition characterized by severe mucocutaneous epidermal necrolysis and detachment of the epidermis. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →