Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 42 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

The advent of anti-amyloid therapies (AATs) for Alzheimer disease (AD) has elevated the importance of MRI surveillance for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) such as microhemorrhages and siderosis (ARIA-H) and edema (ARIA-E). We report a literature review and early quality-assurance experience with an FDA-cleared decision support artificial intelligence (AI) tool intended for detection of ARIA in MRI clinical workflows. The AI system improved the sensitivity for detection of subtle ARIA-E and ARIA-H lesions but at the cost of a reduction in specificity. We propose a tiered workflow combining protocol harmonization and expert interpretation with an AI overlay review. AI-assisted ARIA detection is a paradigm shift that offers great promise to enhance patient safety as disease-modifying therapies for AD gain broader clinical use; however, some pitfalls need to be considered.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Petrella, J. R., Liu, A., Wang, L., & Doraiswamy, P. M. (2025). Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Detection of Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities: Promise and Pitfalls. American Journal of Neuroradiology. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a8946

Vancouver

Petrella JR, Liu A, Wang L, Doraiswamy PM. Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Detection of Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities: Promise and Pitfalls. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2025. doi:10.3174/ajnr.a8946. PMID: 40738658.

BibTeX

@article{petrella2025-40738658,
  author  = {Petrella, Jeffrey R. and Liu, Ao and Wang, Li and Doraiswamy, Pudugramam Murali},
  title   = {{Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Detection of Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities: Promise and Pitfalls}},
  journal = {American Journal of Neuroradiology},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.3174/ajnr.a8946},
  pmid    = {40738658},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a8946}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

An FDA-cleared AI decision support tool improved sensitivity for detecting subtle ARIA-E and ARIA-H lesions on MRI but reduced specificity. The authors propose a tiered workflow combining protocol harmonization and expert interpretation with AI overlay review, noting both promise and pitfalls for patient safety as disease-modifying therapies gain broader use.

Study details

How this study scored 42/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 42 of 100.42 of 100 points earned58 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (American Journal of Neuroradiology)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 American Journal of Neuroradiology: journal h-index 182 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 6 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 6 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Pudugramam Murali Doraiswamy: h-index 105 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: institution h-index 1,674 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40738658)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 42 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →