Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 42 out of 100. Genetics

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

This joint Position Paper, developed by the Italian Expert Panel on Alzheimer convened by the Italian Society of Neurology with participation from multiple scientific societies, outlines strategic guidelines for reorganizing the patient journey in the era of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies for Alzheimer's disease. Emphasizing a multidisciplinary and integrated approach, the document recommends a patient journey that begins with early identification of cognitive impairment by General Practitioners, continues with specialized assessments at Memory and Dementia Centres, and leads, in carefully selected cases, to initiation of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody therapy. It advocates the rational use of diagnostic tools, including plasma and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, advanced neuroimaging (MRI and PET), and genetic profiling (ApoE genotyping), not only to identify eligible patients but also to stratify those requiring alternative care strategies. The paper further defines minimum requirements for the accreditation of prescribing and infusion centres, highlighting the clinical competencies, structural resources, and inter-professional communication protocols necessary to ensure safety and appropriateness. Recognizing both the therapeutic potential and the organizational challenges associated with anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies, the document aims to guide healthcare policymakers, institutions, and practitioners toward a coordinated reorganization of the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway, ensuring the safe and effective use of these treatments and ultimately improving outcomes and quality of care for individuals with Alzheimer's disease.

Key findings

Why it matters

This position paper recommends reorganizing the diagnostic and treatment pathway for anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies in Alzheimer disease, including early identification, specialized assessment, and accreditation of treatment centers. It is a set of recommendations, not a study of whether these antibodies work or are safe.

Study details

How this study scored 42/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 42 of 100.42 of 100 points earned58 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neurological Sciences)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Neurological Sciences: journal h-index 113 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 14 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 4.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 7.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 14 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Andrea Ungar: h-index 56 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Karolinska Institutet: institution h-index 1,477 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 41 institution(s) in 4 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41102550)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 42 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Benussi, A., Agosta, F., Alfano, A. R., Antico, A., Bellelli, G., Bonanni, L., et al. (2025). Italian intersocietal recommendations for restructuring the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway for the implementation and appropriate use of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08576-y

Vancouver

Benussi A, Agosta F, Alfano AR, Antico A, Bellelli G, Bonanni L, et al. Italian intersocietal recommendations for restructuring the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway for the implementation and appropriate use of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurological Sciences. 2025. doi:10.1007/s10072-025-08576-y. PMID: 41102550.

BibTeX

@article{benussi2025-41102550,
  author  = {Benussi, Alberto and Agosta, Federica and Alfano, Alba Rosa and Antico, Antonio and Bellelli, Giuseppe and Bonanni, Laura and Bottini, Gabriella and Bozzali, Marco and others},
  title   = {{Italian intersocietal recommendations for restructuring the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway for the implementation and appropriate use of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies in Alzheimer’s disease}},
  journal = {Neurological Sciences},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1007/s10072-025-08576-y},
  pmid    = {41102550},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08576-y}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 49.

Related studies in Genetics

Also in Genetics

173 studies in the library are filed under Genetics with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Genetics hub.

Similar studies

More on Genetics

See all studies in Genetics →