30,980 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Elevated blood pressure during midlife, persistence of elevated blood pressure into late life, and, among nonhypertensives, a steep decline in blood pressure during mid- to late life were associated with an increased dementia risk in a community-based cohort. 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,440 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cerebral hypoperfusion has previously been associated with mild cognitive impairment and dementia in various cross-sectional studies, but whether hypoperfusion precedes neurodegeneration is unknown. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 4,759 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Individual conditions have been identified as risk factors for dementia; however, it is important to consider the role of multimorbidity, as conditions often co-occur. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 960 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Whether this results in an increased risk for dementia remains unclear. 4 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 3,975 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Low bone mineral density (BMD) and dementia commonly co-occur in older individuals, with bone loss accelerating in patients with dementia due to physical inactivity and poor nutrition. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 3,651 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The study consisted of 20 400 patients (9264 female [45.4%]; 1576 Black [7.7%], 3944 Latinx [19.3%], and 10 480 White [51.4%]), including 5100 patients with mTBI (median [IQR] age, 36.0 [25.0-51.0] years), 5100 patients with msTBI (median [IQR age, 35.0 [25.0-52.0] years), and 10 200 matched patients in the control group (median [IQR] age, 36.0 [25.0-51.0] years). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 400 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 13,875 individuals with nonmissing VRF and outcome data with up to 30 years of follow-up (25% Black, 54% female), 179 developed PD at a mean age of 73.4 years, 94 developed PDD at a mean age of 79.2 years, and 1,791 developed dementia without PD at a mean age of 79.7 years. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 13,875 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 11 601 participants (mean [SD] age, 59.18 [9.41] years; 5569 male [48.0%]), 9145 (78.8%) were exposed to at least 1 ACE indicator, 4241 (36.6%) to at least 1 AAE indicator, and 3531 (30.4%) to both ACE and AAE markers. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 601 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among eligible participants (n = 705,061), 264,294 individuals (37.5% of eligible participants) initiated any statin during 2001-2010 ("initiators"), of whom 249,613 (94.4%) were matched with 255,937 unique noninitiators to create the analytic sample (322,358 unique participants; mean age at baseline = 67.4 years; 55.1% female). 3 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 322,358 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
No significant association was found between MHT use and risk of mild cognitive impairment or dementia. 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 1,016,055 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our findings showed significant associations between hearing and vision impairments and increased risks of all-cause and cause-specific dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 937,908 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our findings suggest that statins might be associated with a lower risk of incident AD among individuals with the APOE ε4 allele. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 4,807 Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In this cohort study, high adherence to a flavonoid-rich diet score was associated with a lower risk of dementia, with reductions more pronounced in individuals with a high genetic risk, hypertension, and depressive symptoms. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 121,986 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
After a median follow-up of 6.3 years, 678 individuals were diagnosed with dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 84,854 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A substantial proportion of the relationship between education and dementia was mediated through mid-life vascular risk factors. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 13,368 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In the cohort analyses, 891 incident dementia cases were identified over 166,762 person-years. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 207,981 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
At 48 months, group differences between clinical progressors and non-progressors were significant for self (2.13, SE=0.45, P Conclusions and relevance Demonstrating long-term clinical benefit will be critical for the success of recently launched secondary prevention trials. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 468 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Greater understanding of the risk factors and mechanisms of incident dementia in stroke survivors is needed for prevention and management. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 355 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We observed a complex series of relationships between social-environment variables and cognitive decline and dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 2,854 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Intake of coffee alone or in combination with tea was associated with lower risk of poststroke dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 365,682 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In this large cohort, exposure to air pollution, even at the relative low levels, was associated with higher dementia incidence. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among well-functioning older adults, DM and poor glucose control among those with DM are associated with worse cognitive function and greater decline. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 717 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Retinal structures may serve as a biomarker for dementia, but longitudinal studies examining this link are lacking. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 5,065 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia has been associated with COVID-19 prevalence, but whether this reflects higher infection, older age of patients, or disease severity remains unclear. 4 key findings →
Participants: 1,814 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We analyzed prospectively collected data in the Original and Offspring FHS cohorts. 4 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 4,906 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 30,980 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 30,980 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.2% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.4%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,042 records (3.4% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 967 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events