The incidence of PUs was 0.38 per person-year in the NH. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,938 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The incidence of PUs was 0.38 per person-year in the NH. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,938 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Depression is highly common throughout the life course and dementia is common in late life. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Recent epidemiological studies show a strong reduction in the incidence of Alzheimer's disease in patients treated with cholesterol-lowering statins. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Frailty is a risk for postoperative complications and an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality, institutional discharge, and reduced midterm survival. 1 key finding →
Participants: 3,826 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Falls are a common problem in PD and some of the major risk factors are potentially modifiable. 2 key findings →
Participants: 109 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
It has been postulated that oxidative stress may play a key role in dementia. 3 key findings →
Participants: 1,367 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Most older individuals develop inflammageing, a condition characterized by elevated levels of blood inflammatory markers that carries high susceptibility to chronic morbidity, disability, frailty, and premature death. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Hypertension is a major risk factor for many common chronic diseases, such as heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, vascular dementia, and chronic kidney disease. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Hypertension has emerged as a leading cause of age-related cognitive impairment. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Temporal pole hyperintensity is a radiologic marker of CADASIL. 1 key finding →
Participants: 20 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Among adults with DS, decreasing levels of plasma Aβ42, a decline in the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, or increasing levels of Aβ40 may be sensitive indicators of conversion to AD, possibly reflecting compartmentalization of Aβ peptides in the brain. 3 key findings →
Participants: 225 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Obesity is associated with lower brain volumes in cognitively normal elderly subjects, but no study has yet investigated the effects of obesity on brain structure in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Participants: 399 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Retinal vessels provide a unique opportunity to study both systemic and cerebrovascular disease. 4 key findings →
Participants: 5,553 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Identifying nutrition- and lifestyle-based risk factors for cognitive impairment and dementia may aid future primary prevention efforts. 4 key findings →
Participants: 104 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The interplay between midlife vascular risk factors and midlife cognitive function with later life mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia (DEM) is not well understood. 4 key findings →
Participants: 5,995 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Age-related hearing loss (ARHL) has been considered as a promising modifiable risk factor for cognitive impairment and dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Prospective studies reporting associations between cognitive performance and subsequent incident dementia have been subject to attrition bias. 3 key findings →
Participants: 1,051 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The authors recruited 83 patients with PD and 50 controls, all without dementia at initial assessment, and assessed them at regular intervals over a maximum period of 122 months. 4 key findings →
Participants: 83 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Medicare beneficiaries with a little or a lot of trouble hearing had 18% (95% confidence interval [CI] odds ratio [OR] = 1.10-1.27) and 25% (95% CI OR = 1.07-1.47) increased odds of reporting greater difficulty with understanding Medicare, respectively, compared with those with no hearing trouble. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 10,510 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The average PM2.5 levels in the IHS counties were lower than those in all US counties, while the mean O3 levels in the IHS counties were higher than the US counties. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 26,871 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The moderate to high isolation group demonstrated a significantly elevated risk of dementia compared with the low isolation group. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 8,189 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Over a median follow-up of 13.5 years, 1453 dementia cases were identified. 5 key findings →
Participants: 131,209 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among the 1 268 599 participants (mean age, 73.9 [SD, 6.1] years; n = 25 335 [2%] female), dementia incidence rates per 1000 person-years were lowest in the Mid-Atlantic (11.2; 95% CI, 11.1-11.4) and highest in the Southeast (14.0; 95% CI, 13.8-14.2). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 25 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We identify three distinct profiles: active healthy sleepers (AHS; 64.0%), fragmented poor sleepers (FPS; 14.1%), and long and frequent nappers (LFN; 21.9%). 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Social isolation and loneliness were associated with a greater risk for incident dementia among T2DM individuals, with differential explanatory factors. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 24,986 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
10 of the 3,281 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →