Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 80 out of 100. Prevention and risk

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is the preclinical and transitional stage between healthy ageing and dementia that may be a potential 'target' for interventions designed to delay progression to dementia. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the prevalence of MCI worldwide in community-dwelling adults aged 50 years and older. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and PsycINFO database searches were conducted from their respective inception dates to 1 September 2021. Data on the overall prevalence of MCI were synthesised using random effects models. Results A total of 66 articles covering 242,804 participants fulfilled study criteria for inclusion. The overall prevalence of MCI was 15.56% (95%CI: 13.24-18.03%). Prevalence rates of amnestic MCI and non-amnestic MCI were 10.03% (95%CI: 7.98-12.27%) and 8.72% (95%CI: 6.78-10.89%), respectively. The prevalence of MCI increased with age and decreased with education level. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses revealed that region of study site and male gender proportion per sample were significant correlates of MCI prevalence. Conclusion The global prevalence of MCI among community dwellers is over 15% and is affected by age, gender, education level and region of study sites. Assessment and interventions targeting MCI within at-risk population subgroups should be considered toward the prevention of dementia.

Key findings

Why it matters

This systematic review and meta-analysis found the overall global prevalence of mild cognitive impairment among community dwellers aged 50 and older was 15.56%. Prevalence increased with age and decreased with education level, and the authors say assessment and interventions targeting mild cognitive impairment within at-risk subgroups should be considered toward dementia prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 80/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 5 of 5; Impact for its field and year 6 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 4 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 77 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 80 of 100. Total 80 of 100.77 of the 96 points we could judge = 80 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a systematic review of all the studies on the question. We have no data on journal's citation record, so that was left out: it earned 77 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 80 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Age and ageing)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 12 / 12 A systematic review of all the studies on the question
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2022 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 242,804 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 398 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 5 / 5 66.3 citations a year over 6 year(s) since 2022
Impact for its field and year 6 / 6 Cited 49.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 11 other studies in this library
Still being cited 4 / 4 Cited 354 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Yu‐Tao Xiang: h-index 87 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Hong Kong Polytechnic University: institution h-index 668 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 3 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 35977150)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 77 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 77 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 80 out of 100.
Total 80 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Bai, W., Chen, P., Cai, H., Zhang, Q., Su, Z., Cheung, T., et al. (2022). Worldwide prevalence of mild cognitive impairment among community dwellers aged 50 years and older: a meta-analysis and systematic review of epidemiology studies. Age and ageing. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac173

Vancouver

Bai W, Chen P, Cai H, Zhang Q, Su Z, Cheung T, et al. Worldwide prevalence of mild cognitive impairment among community dwellers aged 50 years and older: a meta-analysis and systematic review of epidemiology studies. Age and ageing. 2022. doi:10.1093/ageing/afac173. PMID: 35977150.

BibTeX

@article{bai2022-35977150,
  author  = {Bai, W. and Chen, P. and Cai, H. and Zhang, Q. and Su, Z. and Cheung, T. and Jackson, T. and Sha, S. and others},
  title   = {{Worldwide prevalence of mild cognitive impairment among community dwellers aged 50 years and older: a meta-analysis and systematic review of epidemiology studies}},
  journal = {Age and ageing},
  year    = {2022},
  doi     = {10.1093/ageing/afac173},
  pmid    = {35977150},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac173}
}

Later studies that cite this one

11 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Prevention and risk

Similar studies

More on Prevention and risk

See all studies in Prevention and risk →