Topic: Genetics and APOE
Plain-language summary
The allele ε4 of the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE ε4) is the major genetic risk factor for non-dominantly inherited Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Current techniques for APOE ε4 carriers identification show good accuracy but have several disadvantages that limit its implementation in a clinical laboratory. These include the need for sample preprocessing, poor automation, low throughput, requirement of additional equipment, and high cost. We followed ISO 13485 guidelines to validate the e4Risk test, a new latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric blood assay for apolipoprotein E4 (ApoE4) determination in human plasma samples. The test showed high performance in terms of lot to lot variability, precision, interferences, reagents stability, prozone, and detectability. Furthermore, diagnostic accuracy is almost equal (99%) to the gold standard, APOE ε4 genotyping by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Furthermore, we demonstrated that the e4Risk test can be adapted to any clinical chemistry analyzer, including the high throughput analyzers present in most hospitals and clinical laboratories. The e4Risk test versatility, low cost, and easiness provides an excellent solution for APOE ε4 carriers identification using the same blood sample drawn for biochemical diagnostic work-up of AD patients, which can have important advantages for patient stratification in clinical trials, preventative strategies for AD, and clinical assessment of risk for brain amyloidosis.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Veiga, S., Rodríguez-Martín, A., Garcia-Ribas, G., Arribas, I., Menacho-Román, M., & Calero, M. (2020). Validation of a novel and accurate ApoE4 assay for automated chemistry analyzers. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58841-7
Vancouver
Veiga S, Rodríguez-Martín A, Garcia-Ribas G, Arribas I, Menacho-Román M, Calero M. Validation of a novel and accurate ApoE4 assay for automated chemistry analyzers. Scientific reports. 2020. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58841-7. PMID: 32034174.
BibTeX
@article{veiga2020-32034174,
author = {Veiga, Sergio and Rodríguez-Martín, Andrés and Garcia-Ribas, Guillermo and Arribas, Ignacio and Menacho-Román, Miriam and Calero, Miguel},
title = {{Validation of a novel and accurate ApoE4 assay for automated chemistry analyzers}},
journal = {Scientific reports},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-020-58841-7},
pmid = {32034174},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58841-7}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Furthermore, we demonstrated that the e4Risk test can be adapted to any clinical chemistry analyzer, including the high throughput analyzers present in most hospitals and clinical laboratories.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Genetics →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 39/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multicenter collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 22 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 39 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Scientific reports) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 32034174) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 22 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 22 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 39 out of 100. |
| Total | 39 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Genetics from nearby years
Also tagged “apoe2”
265 studies in the library carry the topic tag “apoe2”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 265 tagged studies.