Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 32 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Video use remains low in primary care telehealth consultations. Little is known about patterns of use or policy levers to promote video. To investigate use of video telehealth in Australian general practice under permanent telehealth arrangements post-COVID-19 lockdowns, and during a policy change removing reimbursement for long telephone consultations. Whole-of-population analysis of 2022 national healthcare claims linked to 2021 census data. We quantified the following: proportions of telehealth consultations by video, and of patients and GPs who used video for telehealth consultations; associations between video use and patient characteristics using Poisson regression; and video use in relation to policy changes using interrupted time-series analysis. Of 38 million GP telehealth consultations in 2022, 5.1% were by video; 8.6% of patients and 62% of GPs who used telehealth had used video. Patients most likely to use video lived remotely, were frequent GP users, or had multiple health conditions, mental health conditions or dementia. Socioeconomic disadvantage was modestly associated with lower use of video. Over 2022, use of video for telehealth decreased for consultations (from 6.5% of consultations in January to 4.1% in December), patients (from 6.7% to 4.4%), and GPs (from 40.0% to 26.0%). Time-series analyses showed downward trends before removal of reimbursement for long telephone consultations, small step increases immediately following, and shallower negative trends thereafter. Use of video telehealth consultations in general practice in Australia is low and declining, more so for disadvantaged groups. Differential financial reimbursement of video and telephone consultations has not substantively increased video use in clinical practice.

Key findings

Why it matters

This analysis of Australian general practice found that video telehealth use was low and declined over 2022, with patients who had dementia among those more likely to use video. It concerns telehealth use and policy, not treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 32/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 32 of 100.32 of 100 points earned68 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (BJGP open)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 BJGP Open: journal h-index 39 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-17)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Rosemary Korda: h-index 34 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Australian National University: institution h-index 1,083 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40738688)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 32 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Butler Danielle, C., Di, L. H., Christine, P., Douglas Kirsty, A., Sally, H. D., Jason, A., et al. (2025). Uptake of video telehealth in general practice: an Australian whole-of-population analysis. BJGP open. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpo.2025.0011

Vancouver

Butler Danielle C, Di LH, Christine P, Douglas Kirsty A, Sally HD, Jason A, et al. Uptake of video telehealth in general practice: an Australian whole-of-population analysis. BJGP open. 2025. doi:10.3399/bjgpo.2025.0011. PMID: 40738688.

BibTeX

@article{butlerdanielle2025-40738688,
  author  = {Butler Danielle, C. and Di, Law Hsei and Christine, Phillips and Douglas Kirsty, A. and Sally, Hall Dykgraaf and Jason, Agostino and Emily, Banks and Rachel, Freeman-Robinson and others},
  title   = {{Uptake of video telehealth in general practice: an Australian whole-of-population analysis}},
  journal = {BJGP open},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.3399/bjgpo.2025.0011},
  pmid    = {40738688},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgpo.2025.0011}
}

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also in Health systems and care delivery

172 studies in the library are filed under Health systems and care delivery with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Health systems and care delivery hub.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →