Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 45 out of 100. Disparities

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Objective Telemedicine is increasingly being used to provide consultation for healthcare in rural areas. Little work has been done with dementia although preliminary research suggests that clinical diagnosis performed via telemedicine consultation is valid. We implemented a program to provide multidisciplinary, state-of-the-art diagnosis of cognitive impairment by video-telemedicine (VTM) integrated into a clinical setting. Methods Patients at a rural veteran's community clinic were referred by their local provider for evaluation of memory complaints by the multidisciplinary team of the San Francisco Veterans Administration (SFVA) Memory Disorders Clinic (MDC). The evaluation was integrated into the usual clinic structure and included a neurological evaluation and neuropsychological testing by the MDC team via video assisted by a remote clinician at the community clinic. Results We evaluated 15 new patients referred to our multidisciplinary clinic. In each case, the VTM format permitted the MDC team to arrive at a working diagnosis; 12 patients with dementia, two with mild cognitive impairment, and one cognitively normal. Relevant treatment recommendations were made to the patients and caregivers. The evaluation results were discussed with providers who joined the MDC postclinic conference via VTM. In the majority of cases, recommendations were followed and there was satisfaction with VTM by providers and patients. Conclusions VTM is emerging as an effective way to provide consultation and care to rural residents who may not have access to specialty services and can be integrated into current clinical settings.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Barton, C., Morris, R., Rothlind, J., & Yaffe, K. (2011). Video-telemedicine in a memory disorders clinic: evaluation and management of rural elders with cognitive impairment. Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2011.0083

Vancouver

Barton C, Morris R, Rothlind J, Yaffe K. Video-telemedicine in a memory disorders clinic: evaluation and management of rural elders with cognitive impairment. Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association. 2011. doi:10.1089/tmj.2011.0083. PMID: 22023458.

BibTeX

@article{barton2011-22023458,
  author  = {Barton, C. and Morris, R. and Rothlind, J. and Yaffe, K.},
  title   = {{Video-telemedicine in a memory disorders clinic: evaluation and management of rural elders with cognitive impairment}},
  journal = {Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association},
  year    = {2011},
  doi     = {10.1089/tmj.2011.0083},
  pmid    = {22023458},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2011.0083}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This small program evaluated 15 rural patients with memory complaints using video-telemedicine and found that the format allowed the team to arrive at a working diagnosis and make treatment recommendations. It is about remote diagnosis and management, not about treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease itself.

Study details

How this study scored 45/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 45 of 100.45 of 100 points earned55 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Telemedicine Journal and e-Health: journal h-index 123 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2011 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 12 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 91 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 5.4 citations a year over 17 year(s) since 2011
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 3.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 8 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 11 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Kristine S. Yaffe: h-index 155 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of California, San Francisco: institution h-index 1,915 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 22023458)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 45 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

8 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Disparities

Also tagged “controlled”

1,118 studies in the library carry the topic tag “controlled”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,118 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Disparities

See all studies in Disparities →