Home › Research › Getting a diagnosis
Discrepancies in assessing intellectual disability levels in adults with Down syndrome: Implications for dementia diagnosis
Laura del Hoyo Soriano, Katja Sandkühler, Laura Videla, Bessy Benejam, María Carmona‐Iragui, Elisabeth Wlasich, Julia Kustermann, Isabel Barroeta et al.. Alzheimer s & Dementia, 2025-06-01
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Inter-rater agreement for ID level classification was 95% within sites but 60% between sites. While CAMCOG-DS score distributions in the whole cohort were similar across sites, ID classification discrepancies caused higher cut-offs in Barcelona for mild and moderate ID compared to Munich. Applying site-specific cut-offs to another cohort reduced sensitivity and specificity. Standardizing ID classification is critical for generalizable cut-offs to accurately diagnose AD dementia based on neuropsychological assessments in DS. HIGHLIGHTS: CAMCOG-DS cut-offs by intellectual disability level classify dementia in Down syndrome. ID classification discrepancies between sites impact CAMCOG-DS diagnostic cut-offs. Applying site-specific cut-offs to other cohorts reduces sensitivity and specificity. Standardized ID classification is essential for generalizable cognitive cut-offs. Use site-specific cut-offs until ID classification is standardized.
Key findings
- Inter-rater agreement for ID level classification was 95% within sites but 60% between sites.
- While CAMCOG-DS score distributions in the whole cohort were similar across sites, ID classification discrepancies caused higher cut-offs in Barcelona for mild and moderate ID compared to Munich.
- Applying site-specific cut-offs to another cohort reduced sensitivity and specificity.
- Standardizing ID classification is critical for generalizable cut-offs to accurately diagnose AD dementia based on neuropsychological assessments in DS.
- HIGHLIGHTS: CAMCOG-DS cut-offs by intellectual disability level classify dementia in Down syndrome.
Why it matters
This study found that discrepancies in classifying intellectual disability levels between sites affect the cut-offs used to diagnose dementia in adults with Down syndrome. It highlights the need for standardized classification to improve diagnostic accuracy, but it does not report any treatment, cure, or prevention.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Getting a diagnosis →
Study details
- Study designcohort study
- Participants673
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 57/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia) |
| Journal's citation record | 2 / 4 | Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 7 / 12 | A cohort study following people over time |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 673 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 2 / 7 | Cited 6 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 1 / 5 | 2.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025 |
| Impact for its field and year | 3 / 6 | Cited 5.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 1 / 6 | Cited by 2 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 1 / 4 | Cited 6 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 3 / 4 | Last-listed author Juan Fortea: h-index 72 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 2 / 3 | Washington University in St. Louis: institution h-index 1,962 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 9 institution(s) in 3 countries |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40528393) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 57 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Soriano, L. d. H., Sandkühler, K., Videla, L., Benejam, B., Carmona‐Iragui, M., Wlasich, E., et al. (2025). Discrepancies in assessing intellectual disability levels in adults with Down syndrome: Implications for dementia diagnosis. Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70307
Vancouver
Soriano LdH, Sandkühler K, Videla L, Benejam B, Carmona‐Iragui M, Wlasich E, et al. Discrepancies in assessing intellectual disability levels in adults with Down syndrome: Implications for dementia diagnosis. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2025. doi:10.1002/alz.70307. PMID: 40528393.
BibTeX
@article{soriano2025-40528393,
author = {Soriano, Laura del Hoyo and Sandkühler, Katja and Videla, Laura and Benejam, Bessy and Carmona‐Iragui, María and Wlasich, Elisabeth and Kustermann, Julia and Barroeta, Isabel and others},
title = {{Discrepancies in assessing intellectual disability levels in adults with Down syndrome: Implications for dementia diagnosis}},
journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1002/alz.70307},
pmid = {40528393},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70307}
}
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Later studies that cite this one
2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.
Related studies in Getting a diagnosis
Also tagged “down”
527 studies in the library carry the topic tag “down”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 527 tagged studies.