Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 57 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Inter-rater agreement for ID level classification was 95% within sites but 60% between sites. While CAMCOG-DS score distributions in the whole cohort were similar across sites, ID classification discrepancies caused higher cut-offs in Barcelona for mild and moderate ID compared to Munich. Applying site-specific cut-offs to another cohort reduced sensitivity and specificity. Standardizing ID classification is critical for generalizable cut-offs to accurately diagnose AD dementia based on neuropsychological assessments in DS. HIGHLIGHTS: CAMCOG-DS cut-offs by intellectual disability level classify dementia in Down syndrome. ID classification discrepancies between sites impact CAMCOG-DS diagnostic cut-offs. Applying site-specific cut-offs to other cohorts reduces sensitivity and specificity. Standardized ID classification is essential for generalizable cognitive cut-offs. Use site-specific cut-offs until ID classification is standardized.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that discrepancies in classifying intellectual disability levels between sites affect the cut-offs used to diagnose dementia in adults with Down syndrome. It highlights the need for standardized classification to improve diagnostic accuracy, but it does not report any treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 57/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 57 of 100.57 of 100 points earned43 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 673 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 6 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 2 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 6 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Juan Fortea: h-index 72 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Washington University in St. Louis: institution h-index 1,962 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 9 institution(s) in 3 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40528393)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 57 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Soriano, L. d. H., Sandkühler, K., Videla, L., Benejam, B., Carmona‐Iragui, M., Wlasich, E., et al. (2025). Discrepancies in assessing intellectual disability levels in adults with Down syndrome: Implications for dementia diagnosis. Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70307

Vancouver

Soriano LdH, Sandkühler K, Videla L, Benejam B, Carmona‐Iragui M, Wlasich E, et al. Discrepancies in assessing intellectual disability levels in adults with Down syndrome: Implications for dementia diagnosis. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2025. doi:10.1002/alz.70307. PMID: 40528393.

BibTeX

@article{soriano2025-40528393,
  author  = {Soriano, Laura del Hoyo and Sandkühler, Katja and Videla, Laura and Benejam, Bessy and Carmona‐Iragui, María and Wlasich, Elisabeth and Kustermann, Julia and Barroeta, Isabel and others},
  title   = {{Discrepancies in assessing intellectual disability levels in adults with Down syndrome: Implications for dementia diagnosis}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz.70307},
  pmid    = {40528393},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70307}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also tagged “down”

527 studies in the library carry the topic tag “down”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 527 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →