Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 29 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Abstract The National Dementia Care Collaborative (NDCC) aims to improve access to and successful implementation of evidence-based comprehensive dementia care. NDCC provides a common learning platform for health systems and other provider organizations implementing or interested in implementing a proven model of comprehensive dementia care. Evidence-based model teams participating with NDCC include the Aging Brain Care (ABC) Program from Indiana University, the Alzheimer’s and Dementia Care (ADC) Program from UCLA, the Benjamin Rose Institute’s Care Consultation (BRI-CC), the Care Ecosystem from UCSF, Maximizing Independence (MIND) at Home from Johns Hopkins University, and the Integrated Memory Care (IMC) program from Emory University, This session will provide descriptions of implementation strategies that are common across these comprehensive dementia care models as well as examples of specific implementation strategies that are unique to one or more model(s). Outcomes will be described regarding the number of new implementations of an evidence-based comprehensive dementia care program in health systems and community-based organizations participating in the CMS GUIDE Model and external to it; this included 51 total new programs in 2024. New emphasis on growing the interest in dementia care models in value-based care, Medicare Advantage, and commercial health plans will also be described.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Epstein-Lubow, G. P., Haggerty, K. E. L., Avalos, M., Johnson, M., & Stoeckle, R. J. (2025). The National Dementia Care Collaborative: Outcomes From Year 1. Innovation in Aging. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.828

Vancouver

Epstein-Lubow GP, Haggerty KEL, Avalos M, Johnson M, Stoeckle RJ. The National Dementia Care Collaborative: Outcomes From Year 1. Innovation in Aging. 2025. doi:10.1093/geroni/igaf122.828.

BibTeX

@article{epsteinlubow2025-c7ad2fef,
  author  = {Epstein-Lubow, Gary P. and Haggerty, Kristin E. Lees and Avalos, Maria and Johnson, M.R. and Stoeckle, Rebecca Jackson},
  title   = {{The National Dementia Care Collaborative: Outcomes From Year 1}},
  journal = {Innovation in Aging},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1093/geroni/igaf122.828},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf122.828}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

The National Dementia Care Collaborative supports health systems in implementing evidence-based comprehensive dementia care models, and 51 new programs began in 2024. It addresses how care is delivered, not how Alzheimer's disease is treated, cured or prevented.

Study details

How this study scored 29/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 0 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 29 of 100.29 of 100 points earned71 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Innovation in Aging)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Innovation in Aging: journal h-index 48 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 51 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 0 / 4 Last-listed author Rebecca Jackson Stoeckle: h-index 3 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Education Development Center: institution h-index 113 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 29 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →