Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 28 out of 100. End-of-life care

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

OBJECTIVE: Patients and their caregivers and families confronting dementia often face heavy burdens from difficult-to-control symptoms, uncertainty about the future, and a high risk of care partner burnout. This article explores common palliative care dilemmas in dementia care and reviews evidence-based approaches to management. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: Research has recently accumulated about epidemiologic trends and racial disparities in dementia prevalence. Dementia-specific advance directives are being explored to help improve the ability of patients and their families to plan for the future. Although major breakthroughs have been elusive in the treatment of many common symptoms of dementia, research has further delineated the risks and benefits of many commonly used medications to guide routine clinical practice and added a few new options. Regarding deprescribing to limit polypharmacy in patients with dementia, new data about the mortality benefits of cholinesterase inhibitors must be weighed against the potential benefits of simplification. Additionally, research on survival in dementia has provided a more sophisticated tool to individualize prognostication for each patient. ESSENTIAL POINTS: Dementia is a common and often highly burdensome disease process for patients, their caregivers and families, and the community at large. Palliating symptoms and providing guidance surrounding advance care planning and prognostication should be integral components of the management plan for patients with dementia in all settings.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review of neuropalliative care in dementia notes that major breakthroughs have been elusive in treating many common symptoms of dementia, though research has clarified risks and benefits of commonly used medications. It discusses weighing mortality benefits of cholinesterase inhibitors against simplification when deprescribing.

Study details

How this study scored 28/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 0 of 4; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 27 of the 97 points it could be judged on, which is 28 of 100. Total 28 of 100.27 of the 97 points we could judge = 28 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on institution's track record, so that was left out: it earned 27 of the 97 points we could judge it on, which is 28 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology: journal h-index 79 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 0 / 4 Last-listed author Neal Weisbrod: h-index 4 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41328935)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 27 / 97 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 27 of the 97 points we could judge it on is 28 out of 100.
Total 28 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Weisbrod, N. (2025). Neuropalliative Care in Dementia. CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/cont.0000000000001639

Vancouver

Weisbrod N. Neuropalliative Care in Dementia. CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology. 2025. doi:10.1212/cont.0000000000001639. PMID: 41328935.

BibTeX

@article{weisbrod2025-41328935,
  author  = {Weisbrod, Neal},
  title   = {{Neuropalliative Care in Dementia}},
  journal = {CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1212/cont.0000000000001639},
  pmid    = {41328935},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/cont.0000000000001639}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 15.

Related studies in End-of-life care

Similar studies

More on End-of-life care

See all studies in End-of-life care →