Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 54 out of 100. Long-term cohort studies

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

This text describes the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, which addresses the growing incidence and socioeconomic impact of Alzheimer's disease as life expectancy increases. It notes that AD treatment trials using clinical outcome measures require long observation times and large patient samples. The initiative aims to help identify clinical, neuroimaging, and biomarker outcome measures that provide the highest power for measuring longitudinal changes and predicting transitions.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Mueller, S. G., Weiner, M. W., Thal, L. J., Petersen, R. C., Jack, C. R., Jagust, W. J., et al. (2005). The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2005.09.008

Vancouver

Mueller SG, Weiner MW, Thal LJ, Petersen RC, Jack CR, Jagust WJ, et al. The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America. 2005. doi:10.1016/j.nic.2005.09.008. PMID: 16443497.

BibTeX

@article{mueller2005-16443497,
  author  = {Mueller, Susanne G. and Weiner, Michael Walter and Thal, Leon J. and Petersen, Ronald Carl and Jack, Clifford R. and Jagust, William J. and Trojanowski, John Q. and Toga, Arthur W. and Beckett, Laurel A.},
  title   = {{The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative}},
  journal = {Neuroimaging Clinics of North America},
  year    = {2005},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.nic.2005.09.008},
  pmid    = {16443497},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2005.09.008}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 9 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Why it matters

Describes the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.

How this study scored 54/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence left out, no data; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 7 of 7; Citations per year 5 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 4 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 51 of the 95 points it could be judged on, which is 54 of 100. Total 54 of 100.51 of the 95 points we could judge = 54 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on strength of evidence, so that was left out: it earned 51 of the 95 points we could judge it on, which is 54 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neuroimaging Clinics of North America)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Neuroimaging Clinics of North America: journal h-index 82 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence — / 5 No evidence rating recorded — left out of this score
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2005 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 7 / 7 Cited 1,537 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 5 / 5 66.8 citations a year over 23 year(s) since 2005
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 9.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 4 / 4 Cited 361 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Laurel A. Beckett: h-index 116 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of California, Berkeley: institution h-index 2,012 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 8 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 16443497)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 51 / 95 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 51 of the 95 points we could judge it on is 54 out of 100.
Total 54 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Long-term cohort studies

Also in Long-term cohort studies

54 studies in the library are filed under Long-term cohort studies with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Long-term cohort studies hub.

Similar studies

More on Long-term cohort studies

See all studies in Long-term cohort studies →