Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 55 out of 100. Long-term cohort studies

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background and aims Anti-inflammatory trials have shown considerable benefits for cardiovascular disease. High neutrophil counts, an easily accessible inflammation biomarker, are associated with atherosclerosis in experimental studies. This study aimed to investigate the associations between neutrophil counts and risk of nine cardiovascular endpoints using observational and genetic approaches.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study investigated associations between neutrophil counts and nine cardiovascular endpoints using observational and genetic approaches. It concerns cardiovascular disease, not Alzheimer's disease, and does not address treating, curing or preventing dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 55/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 55 of 100.55 of 100 points earned45 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (European heart journal)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 European Heart Journal: journal h-index 456 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 101 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 166 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 33.2 citations a year over 5 year(s) since 2023
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 17.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 163 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Ruth Frikke‐Schmidt: h-index 65 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Copenhagen: institution h-index 1,378 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 37950632)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 55 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Luo, J., Thomassen, J. Q., Nordestgaard, B. G., Tybjærg-Hansen, A., & Frikke-Schmidt, R. (2023). Neutrophil counts and cardiovascular disease. European heart journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad649

Vancouver

Luo J, Thomassen JQ, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Frikke-Schmidt R. Neutrophil counts and cardiovascular disease. European heart journal. 2023. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad649. PMID: 37950632.

BibTeX

@article{luo2023-37950632,
  author  = {Luo, J. and Thomassen, J. Q. and Nordestgaard, B. G. and Tybjærg-Hansen, A. and Frikke-Schmidt, R.},
  title   = {{Neutrophil counts and cardiovascular disease}},
  journal = {European heart journal},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.1093/eurheartj/ehad649},
  pmid    = {37950632},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehad649}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Long-term cohort studies

Also in Long-term cohort studies

54 studies in the library are filed under Long-term cohort studies with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Long-term cohort studies hub.

Similar studies

More on Long-term cohort studies

See all studies in Long-term cohort studies →