Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 63 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Background Alzheimer disease results in progressive functional decline, leading to loss of independence. Objective To determine whether collaborative care plus 2 years of home-based occupational therapy delays functional decline. Design Randomized, controlled clinical trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01314950). Setting Urban public health system. Patients 180 community-dwelling participants with Alzheimer disease and their informal caregivers. Intervention All participants received collaborative care for dementia. Patients in the intervention group also received in-home occupational therapy delivered in 24 sessions over 2 years. Measurements The primary outcome measure was the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Group Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS ADL); performance-based measures included the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Short Portable Sarcopenia Measure (SPSM). Results At baseline, clinical characteristics did not differ significantly between groups; the mean Mini-Mental State Examination score for both groups was 19 (SD, 7). The intervention group received a median of 18 home visits from the study occupational therapists. In both groups, ADCS ADL scores declined over 24 months. At the primary end point of 24 months, ADCS ADL scores did not differ between groups (mean difference, 2.34 [95% CI, -5.27 to 9.96]). We also could not definitively demonstrate between-group differences in mean SPPB or SPSM values. Limitation The results of this trial are indeterminate and do not rule out potential clinically important effects of the intervention. Conclusion The authors could not definitively demonstrate whether the addition of 2 years of in-home occupational therapy to a collaborative care management model slowed the rate of functional decline among persons with Alzheimer disease. This trial underscores the burden undertaken by caregivers as they provide care for family members with Alzheimer disease and the difficulty in slowing functional decline. Primary funding source National Institute on Aging.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this trial of 180 people with Alzheimer disease, adding two years of home-based occupational therapy to collaborative care did not produce different scores on a measure of daily living activities at 24 months compared with collaborative care alone. The authors state the results are indeterminate and do not rule out potentially important effects of the intervention.

Study details

How this study scored 63/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 63 of 100.63 of 100 points earned37 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for sample size and effect reported because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Annals of internal medicine)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Annals of Internal Medicine: journal h-index 648 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial (from PubMed type “Randomized Controlled Trial”)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2017 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (pubmed indexes it as a clinical or observational study)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 40 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.6 citations a year over 11 year(s) since 2017
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 3.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 7 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Hugh C. Hendrie: h-index 76 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Indiana University: institution h-index 926 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 27893087)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 63 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Callahan, C. M., Boustani, M. A., Schmid, A. A., LaMantia, M. A., Austrom, M. G., Miller, D. K., et al. (2017). Targeting Functional Decline in Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Trial. Annals of internal medicine. https://doi.org/10.7326/m16-0830

Vancouver

Callahan CM, Boustani MA, Schmid AA, LaMantia MA, Austrom MG, Miller DK, et al. Targeting Functional Decline in Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Trial. Annals of internal medicine. 2017. doi:10.7326/m16-0830. PMID: 27893087.

BibTeX

@article{callahan2017-27893087,
  author  = {Callahan, C. M. and Boustani, M. A. and Schmid, A. A. and LaMantia, M. A. and Austrom, M. G. and Miller, D. K. and Gao, S. and Ferguson, D. Y. and others},
  title   = {{Targeting Functional Decline in Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Trial}},
  journal = {Annals of internal medicine},
  year    = {2017},
  doi     = {10.7326/m16-0830},
  pmid    = {27893087},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.7326/m16-0830}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 15.

Related studies in Treatments

Also in Treatments

166 studies in the library are filed under Treatments with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Treatments hub.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →