Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 74 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Results Of the 263 participants in the treatment phase, 132 were randomized to avagacestat and 131 to placebo; an additional 102 participants were observed in an untreated observational cohort. No significant treatment differences were observed in the avagacestat vs placebo arm in key clinical outcome measures. Conclusions and relevance Avagacestat did not demonstrate efficacy and was associated with adverse dose-limiting effects. This PDAD population receiving avagacestat or placebo had higher rates of clinical progression to dementia and greater brain atrophy compared with CSF biomarker-negative participants. The CSF biomarkers and amyloid positron emission tomography imaging were correlated, suggesting that either modality could be used to confirm the presence of cerebral amyloidopathy and identify PDAD.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this randomized trial of 263 people with prodromal Alzheimer's disease, avagacestat did no better than placebo on key clinical measures and caused dose-limiting side effects. Participants identified by spinal-fluid biomarkers, whether given the drug or placebo, progressed to dementia more often and lost more brain volume than biomarker-negative participants. The authors also found that spinal-fluid tests and amyloid PET scans agreed closely enough that they suggest either one could be used to identify these patients.

Study details

How this study scored 74/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 74 of 100.74 of 100 points earned26 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (JAMA neurology)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 JAMA Neurology: journal h-index 235 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2015 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 263 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 239 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 18.4 citations a year over 13 year(s) since 2015
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 10.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 11 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 58 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Robert Berman: h-index 51 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Yale University: institution h-index 1,927 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 16 institution(s) in 5 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 26414022)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 74 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — Unpaywall lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Coric, V., Salloway, S., van Dyck, C. H., Dubois, B., Andreasen, N., Brody, M., et al. (2015). Targeting Prodromal Alzheimer Disease With Avagacestat: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0607

Vancouver

Coric V, Salloway S, van Dyck CH, Dubois B, Andreasen N, Brody M, et al. Targeting Prodromal Alzheimer Disease With Avagacestat: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA neurology. 2015. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0607. PMID: 26414022.

BibTeX

@article{coric2015-26414022,
  author  = {Coric, V. and Salloway, S. and van Dyck, C. H. and Dubois, B. and Andreasen, N. and Brody, M. and Curtis, C. and Soininen, H. and others},
  title   = {{Targeting Prodromal Alzheimer Disease With Avagacestat: A Randomized Clinical Trial}},
  journal = {JAMA neurology},
  year    = {2015},
  doi     = {10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0607},
  pmid    = {26414022},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0607}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 19.

Later studies that cite this one

11 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “double-blind”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “double-blind”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →