Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 68 out of 100. Long-term cohort studies

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Importance Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is recognized to be in the Alzheimer disease (AD) cognitive continuum. The SCD Initiative International Working Group recently proposed SCD-plus (SCD+) features that increase risk for future objective cognitive decline but that have not been assessed in a large community-based setting. Objective To assess SCD risk for mild cognitive impairment (MCI), AD, and all-cause dementia, using SCD+ criteria among cognitively normal adults.

Key findings

Why it matters

This cohort study assessed whether specific features of subjective cognitive decline predict future mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer's disease, and all-cause dementia. It is about identifying risk, not about treating, curing, or preventing the disease.

Study details

How this study scored 68/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 68 of 100.68 of 100 points earned32 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (JAMA psychiatry)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 JAMA Psychiatry: journal h-index 256 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 3,585 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 52 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 13.0 citations a year over 4 year(s) since 2024
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 14.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 3 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 52 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Jesse Mez: h-index 59 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Boston University: institution h-index 1,456 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 38959008)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 68 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Kang, M., Li, C., Mahajan, A., Spat-Lemus, J., Durape, S., Chen, J., et al. (2024). Subjective Cognitive Decline Plus and Longitudinal Assessment and Risk for Cognitive Impairment. JAMA psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1678

Vancouver

Kang M, Li C, Mahajan A, Spat-Lemus J, Durape S, Chen J, et al. Subjective Cognitive Decline Plus and Longitudinal Assessment and Risk for Cognitive Impairment. JAMA psychiatry. 2024. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1678. PMID: 38959008.

BibTeX

@article{kang2024-38959008,
  author  = {Kang, M. and Li, C. and Mahajan, A. and Spat-Lemus, J. and Durape, S. and Chen, J. and Gurnani, A. S. and Devine, S. and others},
  title   = {{Subjective Cognitive Decline Plus and Longitudinal Assessment and Risk for Cognitive Impairment}},
  journal = {JAMA psychiatry},
  year    = {2024},
  doi     = {10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1678},
  pmid    = {38959008},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1678}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 21.

Later studies that cite this one

3 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Long-term cohort studies

Also tagged “assessment”

840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “assessment”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Long-term cohort studies

See all studies in Long-term cohort studies →